UPC CFI 177/2023
22. Juni 2023·EP2546134 · Combination structure of bicycle frame and motor hub
- Verfahrensdetails
- StatusCase ClosedVerfahrensartEinstweilige VerfügungKategorieEinstweilige Maßnahmen
- Parteien
- Beklagte
- Revolt Zycling AGUnternehmen
Vertreter- Phillip Rektorschek
- Oliver Tarvenkorn-Tarvenkorn, Wickord & Partner
- Division
- Dusseldorf LD
- Technologie
- Mechanical engineeringTransport
- Sprache
- German
- Erste Entscheidung
- 22. Juni 2023
- Letzte Entscheidung
- 18. Okt. 2023
| Einstweilige Verfügung erlassen | Median Tage bis zur ersten Entscheidung | |
|---|---|---|
| Gesamt-UPC | 54% (38/70) | 124 |
| Dusseldorf LD | Gesperrt | Gesperrt |
| Richter Ronny Thomas | Gesperrt | Gesperrt |
| Richter Berenice Thom | Gesperrt | Gesperrt |
| Richter András Kupecz | Gesperrt | Gesperrt |
Vor dem UPC: myStromer AG (3 Verfahren)·Revolt Zycling AG (4 Verfahren)
Dieser Streit umfasst 2 weitere Verfahren
1 weitere Beklagte zum selben oder einem verwandten Patent
Starten Sie die kostenlose Testphase, um die Ausgänge zu sehen.
Weitere Verfahren: Dusseldorf LD·2023
- 2023-07-03Application for provisional measuresÖffentlich
Zusammenfassung: The Düsseldorf Local Division granted myStromer AG's application to add a certificate of service and deposit confirmation to the case file in the preliminary injunction proceedings against Revolt Zycling AG.
Rechtsfragen anzeigen (2)
- Submission of documents Rule 9 RoP
- Certificate of service
- 2023-06-30Application for provisional measuresÖffentlich
Zusammenfassung: The Düsseldorf Local Division issued a rectification order under Rule 353 RoP correcting the patent number cited in a prior preliminary injunction order in myStromer AG's action against Revolt Zycling AG (EP 2 546 134, not EP 2 456 134).
Rechtsfragen anzeigen (2)
- Rectification Rule 353 RoP
- Correction of patent number
- 2023-06-22Application for provisional measuresÖffentlich
Zusammenfassung: The Düsseldorf Local Division granted ex parte provisional measures (preliminary injunction) against Revolt Zycling AG restraining it from infringing EP 2 546 134 B1 (bicycle frame/motor hub combination) at the Eurobike 2023 trade fair, ordering EUR 500,000 security and penalty of up to EUR 250,000 per violation.
Rechtsfragen anzeigen (4)
- Provisional measures ex parte Art. 62 UPCA
- Prima facie validity
- Irreparable harm
- Trade fair injunction
- 2023-06-22Application for provisional measuresÖffentlich
Zusammenfassung: The Düsseldorf Local Division issued a scheduling order in myStromer AG's application for provisional measures against Revolt Zycling AG, setting pleading deadlines for the preliminary injunction proceedings.
Rechtsfragen anzeigen (2)
- Preliminary injunction scheduling
- Pleading deadlines
| Dokumenttitel | Datum | Öffentlich |
|---|---|---|
| Case Closure Formal Check | 2025-03-27 | Nicht öffentlich |
| Outcome of the Order | 2024-08-14 | Nicht öffentlich |
| Schließung Workflow | 2024-08-14 | Öffentlich |
| Receipt | 2024-08-13 | Nicht öffentlich |
| 240813_Stellungnahme_Akteneinsicht | 2024-08-13 | Nicht öffentlich |
| Outcome of the Order | 2024-05-04 | Nicht öffentlich |
| Schließung Workflow | 2024-05-04 | Nicht öffentlich |
| Fristverlängerung | 2024-01-22 | Nicht öffentlich |
| Template-Order | 2024-01-22 | Nicht öffentlich |
| Template-Order | 2024-01-22 | Nicht öffentlich |
myStromer AG obtained an ex parte preliminary injunction from the Düsseldorf Local Division against Revolt Zycling AG prohibiting exhibition and offering of Revolt's electric bicycle hub combination structure at the Eurobike 2023 trade fair, based on EP 2546134 B1. The court found preponderant likelihood of infringement and validity, and irreparable harm from loss of trade fair sales contacts. myStromer's subsequent application to rectify the order to add Austria to the territorial scope was refused because the omission was not a manifest error — the underlying application had only addressed Germany, Netherlands, France, and Italy.
Prima facie infringement of EP 2546134 by Revolt Zycling's combination structure of bicycle frame and motor hub exhibited at Eurobike 2023
KlägerRechtsgrundlage: Art. 62 UPCAHinweis: No opposition had been filed against the patent and no revocation action was pending; Revolt presented no relevant prior art in its protective letter.
Urgency established: delay would cause irreparable harm as Eurobike 2023 would enable Revolt to acquire customers and market share at patentee's expense
KlägerRechtsgrundlage: Rule 212.1 RoPHinweis: Products are directly substitutable competing products; trade fair market contacts are not recoverable in damages.
Rectification of injunction order to include Austria in the territorial scope
KlägerRechtsgrundlage: Rule 353 RoPBegründung: The original order was based on the subsidiary request covering Germany, Netherlands, France and Italy only; Austria was not mentioned in the subsidiary request or infringement analysis; omission was not a manifest error under Rule 353 RoP but reflected the court's actual decision.
Weitere Fälle zu diesem Grundsatz ansehen.