UPClytics
Alle Fälle anzeigen

UPC CFI 327/2024

18. Juni 2024·EP3198245 · A SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MONITORING FOOD WASTE

Hauptaktenzeichen: ACT 36388/2024

Verfahrensdetails
Status
Case Closed (Keine Verletzung)
Verfahrensart
Verletzung
Kategorie
Hauptverletzungsklage
Parteien
Kläger
Vertreter
Beklagte
Vertreter
Division
The Hague LD
Technologie
  • Instruments
    Measurement
Sprache
English
Erste Entscheidung
13. Aug. 2025
Im Vergleich
Die Bilanz des Gerichts für diese Art von Verfahren, gezählt in erstinstanzlichen Entscheidungen. Eine Zahl in Klammern gibt an, auf wie vielen Entscheidungen eine Quote beruht.
Verletzung festgestelltMedian Tage bis zur ersten Entscheidung
Gesamt-UPC53% (62/117)124
The Hague LDGesperrtGesperrt
Richter Edger BrinkmanGesperrtGesperrt
Richter Petri RinkinenGesperrtGesperrt
Richter Margot KokkeGesperrtGesperrt
Richter Alessandro SanchiniGesperrtGesperrt

Vor dem UPC: Winnow Solutions Limited (4 Verfahren)·Orbisk B.V. (4 Verfahren)

Entscheidungen
  • 2024-10-14
    Procedural OrderÖffentlich

    Zusammenfassung: Order from The Hague Local Division dated 14 October 2024 partially granting Winnow Solutions Limited's request to produce evidence under R. 190 RoP in its infringement action against Orbisk B.V. The court found a prima facie case of infringement of EP 3 198 245 B1 and ordered Orbisk to produce certain documents, but limited the scope as the original request was too broad. Non-infringement and invalidity arguments were reserved for full panel evaluation. Orbisk was granted a period to file a R. 262A motion and access to the produced documents was restricted to Winnow's legal representatives.

    Rechtsfragen anzeigen (4)
    • Order to produce evidence under R. 190 RoP
    • Prima facie infringement assessment
    • Proportionality of evidence request
    • Confidentiality of produced documents under R. 262A RoP
  • 2024-08-06

    Zusammenfassung: The Hague Local Division issued a procedural order granting defendant Orbisk B.V. an extension to respond to Winnow Solutions Limited's evidence production request (R. 190 RoP) until 6 September 2024 (one week beyond the three-week period previously granted and the four-week extension Winnow agreed to), rather than allowing Orbisk to defer its response until its Statement of Defence on 27 September 2024. The extension was granted solely on account of the summer holiday period.

    Rechtsfragen anzeigen (3)
    • Extension of time limit (R. 9.3 RoP)
    • Production of evidence request (R. 190 RoP / Art. 59 UPCA)
    • Timing of response relative to Statement of Defence
  • —
    revocation counterclaim

    Zusammenfassung: In the main infringement claim: A. Dismisses the orders sought by Winnow, B. Orders Winnow Solutions Limited to pay Orbisk B.V. the sum of EUR 112,000 as legal costs and EUR 5,500 as expert costs incurred by Orbisk, In the counterclaim for revocation: C. Revokes European patent EP 3198245 as granted in the contracting member states of the UPCA and maintains the patent in the contracting member states of the UPCA in a form according to Conditional Request 3:

DokumenttitelDatumÖffentlich
Headnote-and-Keywords2025-08-13Nicht öffentlich
20250813 Winnow_Orbisk final signed-anon2025-08-13Nicht öffentlich
20250813 Winnow_Orbisk final signed-anon2025-08-13Nicht öffentlich
DecisionOutcome2025-08-13Nicht öffentlich
final decision2025-08-13Öffentlich
final decision2025-08-13Öffentlich
final decision2025-08-13Nicht öffentlich
ORAL_HEARING_REFERENCING_36388_2024_OH_HAG_LOC_UPC2025061810am2025-06-25Nicht öffentlich
ORAL_HEARING_REFERENCING_36388_2024_OH_HAG_LOC_UPC2025061810am2025-06-25Nicht öffentlich
Acknowledgement-of-change-of-a-representative2025-06-17Nicht öffentlich
Abdeckung: Teilweise.Begründung teilweise extrahiert — einige Abschnitte können unvollständig sein.
Zusammenfassung in einfacher Sprache

Winnow Solutions Limited brought an infringement action against Orbisk B.V. in the Hague Local Division concerning EP 3 198 245 (a food waste monitoring system). The court partially revoked the patent, maintaining it only in the narrowed form of Conditional Request 3 (which adds a stability controller feature), and dismissed all of Winnow's infringement claims because Orbisk's system did not infringe the patent in that maintained form. Winnow was ordered to pay 85% of Orbisk's costs (EUR 112,625 total).

Angenommene Argumente
Was das Gericht akzeptiert hat — nach Partei.
  • If patent valid only in a form not claimed to be infringed, patentee bears costs of counterclaim for revocation

    BeklagterRechtsgrundlage: R. 118.5 RoP

    Hinweis: The Hague LD articulated the cost allocation principle: where revocation succeeds partially and the surviving claim form is not the form asserted as infringed, patentee bears costs of the revocation proceedings.

  • Partial revocation — EP 3 198 245 as granted invalid; maintained only in form of Conditional Request 3

    BeklagterRechtsgrundlage: Art. 138(1) EPC

    Hinweis: Court revoked the patent as granted and maintained it only in Conditional Request 3 form, which added a 'stability controller' feature absent from the asserted claims.

Zurückgewiesene Argumente
Was das Gericht nicht akzeptiert hat — und warum.
  • Orbisk's food waste monitoring system infringes EP 3 198 245

    Kläger

    Begründung: Patent found not infringed in the form maintained by the court (Conditional Request 3); all infringement claims dismissed.

  • R. 190 RoP application for document production

    KlägerRechtsgrundlage: Rule 190 RoP

    Begründung: Application dismissed (no further reasoning visible in excerpt).

Hinweise zur Anspruchsauslegung

The patent as granted covered a food waste monitoring system with an industrial washable floor scale. The court maintained the patent only in Conditional Request 3, which added a 'stability controller configured to receive weight signals from the floor scale, detect weight changes and control transmission of weight signals to the processor based upon stability of the weight signal' — with the stability period generated based on the magnitude of change in the weight signal. Orbisk's system was not found to infringe this narrowed claim form.