UPC Analytics
DEEN
Übersicht · Eingereicht: 3. Juli 2024

UPC_CFI_386/2024

SYSTEM FOR SECURING SHELF ACCESSORIES TO A SHELF

VerletzungHauptverletzungsklageThe Hague LDInfringementCase Closed
Dieser Fall zitiert
In den Entscheidungen dieses Falls zitierte Quellen.

Verfahrensordnung · 3

QuelleRechtsfrageBindungskraftAuszug
61.1jurisdiction — admissibility of counterclaim for declaration of non-infringementBindendThere was no assertion of infringement prior to instituting the counterclaim nor had defendant applied in writing for an acknowledgement as meant in R. 61.1 RoP.
61.1jurisdiction — counterclaim for non-infringement requirementsBindendIt would also mean that effectively R. 61.1.a and b would be rendered redundant.
61.1jurisdiction — 30-day response triggering non-infringement counterclaimBindendFailure to respond with an acknowledgement within 30 days from counterclaim does not trigger R. 61.1.b RoP, as it would run counter to the very point of R. 61.1 RoP
Zitiert in
Spätere UPC-Entscheidungen, die diesen Fall zitieren.

Bisher in keiner anderen Entscheidung unseres Korpus zitiert.