UPClytics
Alle Fälle anzeigen

UPC CFI 492/2024

16. Aug. 2024·EP4238202 · MOBILE HYBRID GENERATOR SYSTEM FOR PROVIDING ELECTRICAL POWER

Hauptaktenzeichen: ACT 47484/2024

Verfahrensdetails
Status
Case Closed
Verfahrensart
Allgemein
Kategorie
Beweis & Inspektion
Parteien
Kläger
Vertreter
  • Mikkel Kleis-Patrade
  • Lasse Rosenlund Lauridsen
Beklagte
Vertreter
Division
Copenhagen LD
Technologie
  • Electrical engineering
    Electrical machinery, apparatus, energy
Sprache
Danish
Erste Entscheidung
26. Aug. 2024
Letzte Entscheidung
5. Dez. 2025
EPA-Einspruch
Im Vergleich
Wie lange das Gericht bis zu einer ersten Entscheidung braucht.
Median Tage bis zur ersten Entscheidung
Gesamt-UPC124
Copenhagen LDGesperrt
Richter Peter AgergaardGesperrt
Richter Stefan SchillingGesperrt
Richter Stefan JohanssonGesperrt

Vor dem UPC: Hybridgenerator ApS (12 Verfahren)·HGSystem ApS (12 Verfahren)

Entscheidungen
  • 2025-12-05
    Application for preserving evidence pursuant to RoP192Öffentlich

    Zusammenfassung: The Copenhagen Local Division (in Danish) imposed penalty payments of EUR 67,500 on HGSystem ApS and associated entities for delayed compliance with a preservation of evidence order in proceedings concerning EP 4 238 202 B1. The defendants had failed to provide access codes and login information for financial systems, email accounts, and a seized computer for 36 days. The Court found penalties of EUR 5,000 per day appropriate for the first 18-day period and EUR 2,500 per day for the subsequent 18 days, acknowledging that penalties also serve a punitive function even where the obligation has since been fulfilled. Costs deferred to the main proceedings.

    Rechtsfragen anzeigen (3)
    • Penalty payments for non-compliance with preservation of evidence order
    • Punitive character of penalties
    • Delayed provision of digital access codes
  • 2025-03-03
    Application for preserving evidence pursuant to RoP192Öffentlich

    Zusammenfassung: Order by the Copenhagen Local Division in preservation of evidence proceedings. The court ruled that the supplementary IT expert report from the evidence preservation procedure may be disclosed to the parties' representatives under confidentiality obligations. The court declined to impose penalty payments at that stage. Costs deferred to main proceedings.

    Rechtsfragen anzeigen (4)
    • Preservation of evidence (Rule 192 RoP)
    • Disclosure of expert report to parties
    • Penalty payments
    • Confidentiality obligations
  • 2024-08-26
    Application for preserving evidence pursuant to RoP192Öffentlich

    Zusammenfassung: Order for preservation of evidence in proceedings before the Copenhagen Local Division. The text of the order is largely illegible in the extracted PDF; only the signature of judge Peter Juul Agergaard (dated 26 August 2024) is visible. No substantive ruling on infringement or validity is recorded in the available text.

    Rechtsfragen anzeigen (1)
    • Preservation of evidence (R. 192 RoP)
DokumenttitelDatumÖffentlich
Mitteilung2026-07-06Nicht öffentlich
Mitteilung2026-07-04Nicht öffentlich
Receipt2026-06-27Nicht öffentlich
Cover sheet2026-06-27Nicht öffentlich
Application document Defendant2026-06-27Nicht öffentlich
Order2026-02-12Öffentlich
Order2026-02-12Öffentlich
Order2026-02-12Öffentlich
Order2025-12-05Öffentlich
Verfahren abgeschlossen2025-12-05Nicht öffentlich