UPClytics
View all cases

UPC CFI 492/2024

Aug 16, 2024·EP4238202 · MOBILE HYBRID GENERATOR SYSTEM FOR PROVIDING ELECTRICAL POWER

Action number: ACT 47484/2024

Case details
Status
Case Closed
Action
Generic
Category
Evidence and inspection
Parties
Claimants
Representatives
  • Mikkel Kleis-Patrade
  • Lasse Rosenlund Lauridsen
Respondents
Representatives
Division
Copenhagen LD
Technology
  • Electrical engineering
    Electrical machinery, apparatus, energy
Language
Danish
First decided
Aug 26, 2024
Last decision
Dec 5, 2025
EPO Opposition
How this compares
How long the court takes to reach a first decision.
Median days to first decision
All UPC124
Copenhagen LDLocked
Judge Peter AgergaardLocked
Judge Stefan SchillingLocked
Judge Stefan JohanssonLocked

At the UPC: Hybridgenerator ApS (12 cases)·HGSystem ApS (12 cases)

Decisions
  • 2025-12-05
    Application for preserving evidence pursuant to RoP192Public

    Summary: The Copenhagen Local Division (in Danish) imposed penalty payments of EUR 67,500 on HGSystem ApS and associated entities for delayed compliance with a preservation of evidence order in proceedings concerning EP 4 238 202 B1. The defendants had failed to provide access codes and login information for financial systems, email accounts, and a seized computer for 36 days. The Court found penalties of EUR 5,000 per day appropriate for the first 18-day period and EUR 2,500 per day for the subsequent 18 days, acknowledging that penalties also serve a punitive function even where the obligation has since been fulfilled. Costs deferred to the main proceedings.

    Show the legal issues (3)
    • Penalty payments for non-compliance with preservation of evidence order
    • Punitive character of penalties
    • Delayed provision of digital access codes
  • 2025-03-03
    Application for preserving evidence pursuant to RoP192Public

    Summary: Order by the Copenhagen Local Division in preservation of evidence proceedings. The court ruled that the supplementary IT expert report from the evidence preservation procedure may be disclosed to the parties' representatives under confidentiality obligations. The court declined to impose penalty payments at that stage. Costs deferred to main proceedings.

    Show the legal issues (4)
    • Preservation of evidence (Rule 192 RoP)
    • Disclosure of expert report to parties
    • Penalty payments
    • Confidentiality obligations
  • 2024-08-26
    Application for preserving evidence pursuant to RoP192Public

    Summary: Order for preservation of evidence in proceedings before the Copenhagen Local Division. The text of the order is largely illegible in the extracted PDF; only the signature of judge Peter Juul Agergaard (dated 26 August 2024) is visible. No substantive ruling on infringement or validity is recorded in the available text.

    Show the legal issues (1)
    • Preservation of evidence (R. 192 RoP)
Document titleDatePublic
Communication2026-07-06Not public
Communication2026-07-04Not public
Receipt2026-06-27Not public
Cover sheet2026-06-27Not public
Application document Defendant2026-06-27Not public
Order2026-02-12Public
Order2026-02-12Public
Order2026-02-12Public
Order2025-12-05Public
Case closed2025-12-05Not public