UPClytics
Alle Fälle anzeigen

UPC CFI 515/2025

13. Juni 2025·EP3835965 · LOGIC CIRCUITRY

Verfahrensdetails
Status
Case Closed
Verfahrensart
Einstweilige Verfügung
Kategorie
Einstweilige Maßnahmen
Parteien
Kläger
Vertreter
Division
Dusseldorf LD
Technologie
  • Electrical engineering
    Computer technology
  • Mechanical engineering
    Textile and paper machines
Sprache
English
Erste Entscheidung
17. Okt. 2025
Letzte Entscheidung
2. Feb. 2026
Im Vergleich
Die Bilanz des Gerichts für diese Art von Verfahren, gezählt in erstinstanzlichen Entscheidungen. Eine Zahl in Klammern gibt an, auf wie vielen Entscheidungen eine Quote beruht.
Einstweilige Verfügung erlassenMedian Tage bis zur ersten Entscheidung
Gesamt-UPC54% (38/70)124
Dusseldorf LDGesperrtGesperrt
Richter Ronny ThomasGesperrtGesperrt
Richter Rute LopesGesperrtGesperrt
Richter Jule SchumacherGesperrtGesperrt

Vor dem UPC: HP Group (22 Verfahren)·Andreas Rentmeister e.K. (3 Verfahren)

Entscheidungen
  • 2026-02-02

    Zusammenfassung: The Düsseldorf Local Division issued a further procedural order under R. 275.2 RoP in HP's logic circuitry patent provisional measures proceedings, addressing service-related steps following the December 2025 preliminary injunction order.

    Rechtsfragen anzeigen (2)
    • Service order (R. 275.2 RoP)
    • Follow-up to preliminary injunction
  • 2025-12-19
    Application for provisional measuresÖffentlich

    Zusammenfassung: The Düsseldorf Local Division granted a preliminary injunction against Andreas Rentmeister and Shenzhen Moan Technology for infringement of HP's logic circuitry patent EP 3 835 965, deciding on the merits after the defendants failed to lodge an objection following deemed service.

    Rechtsfragen anzeigen (2)
    • Preliminary injunction by default
    • Logic circuitry / replaceable print components
  • 2025-11-11
    Application for provisional measuresÖffentlich

    Zusammenfassung: The Düsseldorf Local Division deemed service of the HP preliminary injunction application on Shenzhen Moan Technology Co. (Defendant 2) to be good service under R. 275.2 RoP, after the Chinese central authority failed to process the Hague Convention request for several months.

    Rechtsfragen anzeigen (3)
    • R. 275.2 RoP deemed good service
    • Hague Convention service failure - Chinese Central Authority inaction
    • Alternative service in provisional measures proceedings
  • 2025-10-17
    Application for provisional measuresÖffentlich

    Zusammenfassung: The Düsseldorf Local Division granted a preliminary injunction against Defendant 1 (Andreas Rentmeister e.K.) prohibiting the sale and distribution of ink cartridges allegedly infringing HP's patent EP 3 835 965 B1 on logic circuitry for replaceable print apparatus components, with penalty payments of up to EUR 250,000 per day.

    Rechtsfragen anzeigen (3)
    • Preliminary injunction for printer cartridge logic circuitry
    • I2C serial data bus interface patent
    • Opt-out withdrawal and UPC jurisdiction
DokumenttitelDatumÖffentlich
Verfahren abgeschlossen2026-02-11Nicht öffentlich
Anordnung2026-02-02Nicht öffentlich
Order2026-02-02Öffentlich
Receipt2026-01-13Nicht öffentlich
Cover sheet2026-01-13Nicht öffentlich
Exhibit document Claimant2026-01-13Nicht öffentlich
Application document Claimant2026-01-13Nicht öffentlich
Entscheidung2025-12-19Nicht öffentlich
Final Order2025-12-19Öffentlich
Cover sheet2025-12-12Nicht öffentlich
Abdeckung: Teilweise.Begründung teilweise extrahiert — einige Abschnitte können unvollständig sein.
Zusammenfassung in einfacher Sprache

HP (Hewlett-Packard Development Company) obtained preliminary injunctions from the Düsseldorf Local Division against both Andreas Rentmeister (German distributor) and Shenzhen Moan Technology (Chinese manufacturer) for infringement of EP 3 835 965 B1 (logic circuitry for printer ink cartridges). A notable procedural principle was established: where Hague Convention service through the Chinese central authority remains unprocessed for months, the court may deem service effective under R. 275.2 RoP, allowing PI proceedings to advance against the unresponsive Chinese defendant.

Angenommene Argumente
Was das Gericht akzeptiert hat — nach Partei.
  • Rentmeister infringes claim 13 of EP 3 835 965 B1 by selling non-HP ink cartridges containing the claimed logic circuitry

    KlägerRechtsgrundlage: Art. 62 UPCA; R. 206 RoP

    Hinweis: Düsseldorf granted the PI against Defendant 1 (Rentmeister) after inter partes hearing on 17 October 2025.

  • Deemed service on Shenzhen Moan Technology under R. 275.2 RoP is valid where Hague Convention service via Chinese central authority has been outstanding for several months without progress

    KlägerRechtsgrundlage: R. 275.2 RoP; Art. 15(3) Hague Service Convention

    Hinweis: Court held that Hague Convention service cannot be delayed indefinitely in PI proceedings; where Chinese authorities took no action for months despite follow-up, deemed service was appropriate.

  • Shenzhen Moan also infringes EP 3 835 965 B1; PI should be extended to Defendant 2 following deemed service

    KlägerRechtsgrundlage: Art. 62 UPCA

    Hinweis: December 2025 order extended PI to Defendant 2 after it failed to lodge an objection following deemed service.

Zurückgewiesene Argumente
Was das Gericht nicht akzeptiert hat — und warum.

Keine zurückgewiesenen Argumente erfasst.

Hinweise zur Anspruchsauslegung

The claim at issue (claim 13 of EP 3 835 965 B1) covers logic circuitry for replaceable print apparatus components that generates low-voltage conditions on an I2C serial data bus for durations based on a received time period and without reference to a clock signal of the bus. The infringement findings for both defendants are based on the accused aftermarket ink cartridge chips implementing this architecture, but the merits reasoning is summarised only at the headnote level in the available excerpt.