UPC_CFI_643/2024

FASTENING DEVICE, HEAD-PROTECTIVE GEAR WITH SUCH A FASTENING DEVICE

Einstweilige MaßnahmenEinstweilige MaßnahmenMilan LDProvisional measuresCase Closed

Übersicht Entscheidungen Begründung Zitate Dokumente Zeitverlauf

Abdeckung: Teilweise.Begründung teilweise extrahiert — einige Abschnitte können unvollständig sein.

Zusammenfassung in einfacher Sprache

Cardo Systems Ltd. (Israel) sought and obtained an ex parte seizure order from the Milan Local Division against Shenzhen Asmax Infinite Technology and Hong Kong Yiheng International Technology, who were exhibiting alleged copies of Cardo's helmet communication fastening device (EP 4 240 194) at the EICMA 2024 trade fair in Milan. The court ordered immediate service by bailiff at the stand, seizure of infringing products and promotional materials, and required Cardo to post EUR 100,000 security; merits proceedings were required within 31 days.

Angenommene Argumente

Was das Gericht akzeptiert hat — nach Partei.

Ex parte seizure and preliminary injunction at EICMA 2024 trade fair warranted given urgency and risk of irreparable harm
KlägerRechtsgrundlage: Art. 62 UPCA; R. 206(3)(a) RoP; R. 211 RoP
Hinweis: Milan Local Division granted ex parte provisional measures because the trade fair created time-critical urgency making prior inter partes procedure impracticable.
Accused products (helmet communication systems) reproduce all features of claims 1 and dependent claims of EP 4 240 194
KlägerRechtsgrundlage: Art. 62 UPCA; infringement of EP4240194
Hinweis: Court accepted prima facie infringement on the basis of the applicant's submissions and exhibits, sufficient for ex parte provisional measures.

Zurückgewiesene Argumente

Was das Gericht nicht akzeptiert hat — und warum.

Keine zurückgewiesenen Argumente erfasst.

Zentrale Rechtsgrundsätze

In der Begründung herangezogene Doktrinen und Regeln.

Ex parte provisional measures available where prior notification would defeat the purpose of the relief (R. 206.3(a) RoP)Trade fair context creates special urgency justifying ex parte approach Security must be provided by applicant as condition of enforceability (Art. 60.5 UPCA)Merits proceedings must be commenced within 31 calendar days or 20 working days or the order is revocable on respondent's request

Weitere Fälle zu diesem Grundsatz ansehen.