Übersicht · Eingereicht: 22. Nov. 2024
UPC_CFI_716/2024
Premixed burner
VerletzungHauptverletzungsklageMannheim LDInfringementCase Closed
Dieser Fall zitiert
In den Entscheidungen dieses Falls zitierte Quellen.
Verfahrensordnung · 5
| Quelle | Rechtsfrage | Bindungskraft | Auszug |
|---|---|---|---|
| 118.5 | costs — recoverable costs | Bindend | The decision on the (recoverable) costs with regard to both the Infringement action and the Counterclaim for revocation is based on Art. 69 (1) UPCA, R. 118.5 RoP. |
| 30 | claim amendment — application linked to defence to counterclaim for revocation | Hintergrund | Since an Application to amend the patent pursuant to R. 30 RoP is linked to the Defence to the CCR, said new time period also applies to a potential Application to amend the patent. |
| 262A | confidential information — access to unredacted version delayed | Hintergrund | access to the unredacted version of the SoD was delayed under Rule 262A RoP. |
| 262A | confidential information — access to unredacted pleadings | Bindend | After a final order pursuant to R. 262A RoP has been issued, Claimant itself was given access to the unredacted version on 19 March 2025. |
| 30 | claim amendment — application to amend patent linked to Defence to CCR | Bindend | Since an Application to amend the patent pursuant to R. 30 RoP is linked to the Defence to the CCR, said new time period also applies to a potential Application to amend the patent. |
EPA-Beschwerdekammern · 1
| Quelle | Rechtsfrage | Bindungskraft | Auszug |
|---|---|---|---|
| EPO_BoA_unspecified | patent validity — upheld in limited form after opposition/appeal before EPO BoA | Hintergrund | It was upheld in limited form in opposition proceedings (cf. B2-patent specification (exhibit B&B1), decision of the Board of Appeal of the European Patent office (exhibits BP 2, 4)) |
EPÜ-Artikel · 1
| Quelle | Rechtsfrage | Bindungskraft | Auszug |
|---|---|---|---|
| 69(1) | costs — based on Art. 69 UPCA and R. 118.5 RoP | Bindend | The decision on the (recoverable) costs with regard to both the Infringement action and the Counterclaim for revocation is based on Art. 69 (1) UPCA, R. 118.5 RoP. |
Zitiert in
Spätere UPC-Entscheidungen, die diesen Fall zitieren.
Bisher in keiner anderen Entscheidung unseres Korpus zitiert.