UPC CFI 770/2024
5. Dez. 2024·EP3519207 · MOTORCYCLES TYRE
- Verfahrensdetails
- StatusCase Closed (Patent verletzt)VerfahrensartVerletzungKategorieHauptverletzungsklage
- Parteien
- Kläger
- PIRELLI TYRE S.P.A.Unternehmen
Vertreter- Federica Franchetti-Orsingher Ortu Avvocati Associati
- Matteo Orsingher-Orsingher Ortu Avvocati Associati
- Davide Graziano-Orsingher Ortu Avvocati Associati
- Antonio Lasca
Beklagte- Sichuan Yuanxing Rubber Co., Ltd.Unternehmen
- CHINA COUNCIL FOR THE PROMOTION OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE, AUTOMOTIVE SUB-COUNCILSonstige / unbekannt
Vertreter- Marco Francesco Antonio Francetti-Jacobacci Avvocati
- Armin Kühne-Noerr Partnerschaftsgesellschaft mbB
- Marina Cristofori-Jacobacci Avvocati
- Steffen Falk Leikhauf-Jacobacci Avvocati
- Fabio Di Biase-Jacobacci Avvocati
- Division
- Milan LD
- Technologie
- Mechanical engineeringTransport
- Sprache
- Italian
- Erste Entscheidung
- 13. Feb. 2026
- Letzte Entscheidung
- 16. Juli 2026
| Verletzung festgestellt | Median Tage bis zur ersten Entscheidung | |
|---|---|---|
| Gesamt-UPC | 53% (62/117) | 124 |
| Milan LD | Gesperrt | Gesperrt |
| Richter Pierluigi Perrotti | Gesperrt | Gesperrt |
| Richter Alima Zana | Gesperrt | Gesperrt |
| Richter Marije Knijff | Gesperrt | Gesperrt |
| Richter Elisabetta Papa | Gesperrt | Gesperrt |
Vor dem UPC: PIRELLI TYRE S.P.A. (9 Verfahren)·Sichuan Yuanxing Rubber Co., Ltd. (6 Verfahren)
Dieser Streit umfasst 5 weitere Verfahren
UPC CFI 2297/2026·UPC CFI 2300/2026·UPC CFI 556/2025·UPC CFI 649/2024·UPC APP 26266/2025
Starten Sie die kostenlose Testphase, um die Ausgänge zu sehen.
- 2026-07-16InfringementÖffentlich
Zusammenfassung: The Milan Local Division granted Pirelli's application for rectification of a clerical error in the decision of 26 May 2026. The erroneous reference stating that Pirelli had filed an opt-out on 30 June 2023 and withdrawn it on 26 November 2024 was deleted from page 9, paragraph 4 of that decision, as Pirelli demonstrated it had never filed any opt-out for EP 3 519 207 B1.
Rechtsfragen anzeigen (2)
- Rectification of clerical error in decision under R. 353 RoP
- Erroneous reference to opt-out filing by claimant
- 2026-05-26Counterclaim for revocationÖffentlich
Zusammenfassung: The Milan Local Division found that Sichuan Yuanxing Rubber Co., Ltd. literally infringed claim 1 of EP 3 519 207 B1 (Pirelli's motorcycle tyre patent) through exhibition of tyres HA-51R and HA-51F at the EICMA fair and promotion on its website. The counterclaim for revocation based on insufficient description and lack of inventive step was rejected, and an injunction was granted against SYR across all UPC Contracting Member States where the patent is in force.
Rechtsfragen anzeigen (12)
- Literal infringement of claim 1 of EP 3 519 207 B1 by motorcycle tyres HA-51R and HA-51F
- Counterclaim for revocation: insufficient description (Art. 65 UPCA / R. 25 RoP)
- Counterclaim for revocation: lack of inventive step (Art. 65 UPCA / R. 25 RoP)
- Claim interpretation under Art. 69 EPC and Protocol on Interpretation
- Meaning of 'motorcycle' vs 'motoveicolo' under Art. 70(1) EPC (authentic text)
- Interpretation of 'tread pattern' and flat-plane representation (feature 1F)
- Interpretation of 'substantially along an axial direction' for transverse grooves (feature 1H)
- Infringement via trade fair exhibition and website promotion
- Proportionality of remedies under Art. 64(4) UPCA (withdrawal/destruction of products denied for lack of commercialisation evidence)
- Interim award of damages (R. 119 RoP) denied
- Burden of proof redistribution (proximity of evidence principle, CJEU C-104/10 Kelly)
- Common general knowledge: whether patent literature showing tread flat-plane representation constitutes CGK (EPO T 1000/12, T 412/09)
- 2026-02-13Infringement ActionÖffentlich
Zusammenfassung: The Milan Local Division issued a post-interim-conference order in Pirelli v. Sichuan Yuanxing Rubber, resolving preliminary objections (with SYR withdrawing a service objection) and addressing admissibility of photographs and product samples from the earlier seizure.
Rechtsfragen anzeigen (3)
- Post-interim-conference order (R. 105.5 RoP)
- Admissibility of photographic evidence
- Withdrawal of service exception
| Dokumenttitel | Datum | Öffentlich |
|---|---|---|
| Veröffentlichung der Anordnung | 2026-07-16 | Nicht öffentlich |
| Anordnung | 2026-07-16 | Nicht öffentlich |
| Order | 2026-07-16 | Öffentlich |
| Anordnung | 2026-07-01 | Nicht öffentlich |
| Order | 2026-07-01 | Nicht öffentlich |
| Receipt | 2026-06-26 | Nicht öffentlich |
| Cover sheet | 2026-06-26 | Nicht öffentlich |
| Receipt | 2026-06-26 | Nicht öffentlich |
| Cover sheet | 2026-06-26 | Nicht öffentlich |
| Document Claimant | 2026-06-26 | Nicht öffentlich |