UPClytics
Alle Fälle anzeigen

UPC CoA 12/2026

30. Jan. 2026·EP2449782 · METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR SIGNALING INTRA PREDICTION FOR LARGE BLOCKS FOR VIDEO ENCODERS AND DECODERS

Verfahrensdetails
Status
Case Closed
Verfahrensart
Berufung
Kategorie
Hauptberufung
Division
Court of Appeal
Technologie
  • Electrical engineering
    Audio-visual technology
Sprache
English
Erste Entscheidung
30. März 2026
Im Vergleich
Wie lange das Gericht bis zu einer ersten Entscheidung braucht.
Median Tage bis zur ersten Entscheidung
Gesamt-UPC124
Richter Ulrike VoßGesperrt
Richter Peter BlokGesperrt
Richter Emmanuel GougéGesperrt

Vor dem UPC: Amazon Group (22 Verfahren)·InterDigital Group (34 Verfahren)

Entscheidungen
  • 2026-03-30
    Appeal RoP220.2Öffentlich

    Zusammenfassung: The Court of Appeal set aside the Court of First Instance orders that had refused Amazon permission to produce a private transcript of an oral hearing audio recording. The Court held that R. 115 RoP does not prohibit parties or their representatives from producing a private transcript of the audio recording, and that assistants or support staff (such as stenographers) may assist in producing such a transcript under supervision. The Court granted Amazon access to the oral hearing recording at the Local Division Düsseldorf and allowed the use of a professional transcriber, subject to confidentiality obligations.

    Rechtsfragen anzeigen (5)
    • Interpretation of R. 115 RoP regarding access to oral hearing audio recordings
    • Whether parties may produce private transcripts of audio recordings of oral hearings
    • Whether assistants or support staff may assist in producing private transcripts under party/representative supervision
    • Permissible uses of private transcripts in UPC and non-UPC proceedings
    • Conditions for using private transcripts in foreign court proceedings related to UPC proceedings
DokumenttitelDatumÖffentlich
Verfahren abgeschlossen2026-03-30Nicht öffentlich
Entscheidung2026-03-30Nicht öffentlich
Final Order2026-03-30Öffentlich
Mündliches Verfahren abgeschlossen2026-03-30Nicht öffentlich
Receipt2026-03-02Nicht öffentlich
Cover sheet2026-03-02Nicht öffentlich
Submission Respondent2026-03-02Nicht öffentlich
Receipt2026-02-26Nicht öffentlich
Cover sheet2026-02-26Nicht öffentlich
Submission Appellant2026-02-26Nicht öffentlich
Angenommene Argumente
Was das Gericht akzeptiert hat — nach Partei.
  • R. 115 RoP does not prohibit parties or their representatives from producing a private transcript of the audio recording; the silence of the provision on private transcripts means they are permitted

    KlägerRechtsgrundlage: R. 115 RoP
  • The Drafting Committee's statement expressly confirmed that parties are free to take notes or arrange for a private transcript to be made

    KlägerRechtsgrundlage: R. 115 RoP drafting history (Exhibit HRM 14)
  • An assistant or support staff such as a stenographer may produce a private transcript in the presence and under the supervision of the party or its representative

    KlägerRechtsgrundlage: R. 115 RoP
  • Concerns about misuse of private transcripts can be addressed by proportionate conditions rather than a blanket prohibition

    KlägerRechtsgrundlage: R. 115 RoP; R. 262A RoP; R. 262 RoP
Zurückgewiesene Argumente
Was das Gericht nicht akzeptiert hat — und warum.
  • Production of a private transcript is not permissible because it could be used outside UPC proceedings to misrepresent Court proceedings, risk personal rights violations, and undermine the open atmosphere of judicial exchange

    BeklagterRechtsgrundlage: R. 115 RoP
  • Private transcripts would be without use as they have no probative value and could impair the search for truth in court proceedings

    BeklagterRechtsgrundlage: R. 115 RoP
  • The prohibition on private transcripts is consistent with the CJEU model under Art. 85 RoP CJEU on which R. 115 RoP was modelled

    BeklagterRechtsgrundlage: Art. 85 RoP CJEU; R. 115 RoP