UPC Analytics
DEEN
Übersicht · Eingereicht: 22. Apr. 2024

UPC_CoA_188/2024

Method for presenting rate-adaptive streams

BerufungenHauptberufungCourt of AppealAppealCase Closed
Parteien

Kläger

  • DISH Technologies L.L.C.
  • Sling TV L.L.C.
Vertreter: Denise Benz (Allen Overy Shearman Sterling)

Beklagte

  • AYLO PREMIUM LTD
  • AYLO Billing Limited
  • AYLO FREESITES LTD
Vertreter: Tilman Müller-Stoy (Bardehle Pagenberg); Conor McLaughlin (Bardehle Pagenberg)
Richter
  • Klaus Grabinski
  • Peter Blok
  • Eric Augarde
  • Klaus Loibner
Patente
  • EP 2 479 956
  • EP 2 479 680
CPC-Codes: G06F15/00, H04N21/64769, H04N21/4331, H04N21/44209, H04N21/44204, H04N21/64792, H04N21/84, H04L65/75, H04N21/25808, H04L47/25, H04N21/8456, H04N21/6587

Sektor: Computing & AI

Ausgang
Abgewiesen
Eingereicht: 22. Apr. 2024
Erste Entscheidung:
Sprache: German

The Court of Appeal dismissed AYLO's appeal against the Munich Local Division's rejection of AYLO's preliminary objection challenging UPC jurisdiction and competence. The Court of Appeal upheld UPC jurisdiction under Art. 7(2) Brussels I recast and Art. 71b(1) in conjunction with Art. 33(1)(a) UPCA, holding that jurisdiction exists where a European patent has effect in at least one Contracting Member State and alleged damage may occur there (including via internet access). The list of preliminary objections in R. 19.1 RoP is exhaustive; defences based on abusive procedural conduct and manifest lack of foundation are not admissible as preliminary objections.

Im UPC-Register öffnen