UPC Analytics
ENDE
Overview · Filed: Apr 22, 2024

UPC_CoA_188/2024

Method for presenting rate-adaptive streams

AppealsMain AppealCourt of AppealAppealCase Closed
Parties

Claimants

  • DISH Technologies L.L.C.
  • Sling TV L.L.C.
Reps: Denise Benz (Allen Overy Shearman Sterling)

Respondents

  • AYLO PREMIUM LTD
  • AYLO Billing Limited
  • AYLO FREESITES LTD
Reps: Tilman Müller-Stoy (Bardehle Pagenberg); Conor McLaughlin (Bardehle Pagenberg)
Judges
  • Klaus Grabinski
  • Peter Blok
  • Eric Augarde
  • Klaus Loibner
Patents
  • EP 2 479 956
  • EP 2 479 680
CPC codes: G06F15/00, H04N21/64769, H04N21/4331, H04N21/44209, H04N21/44204, H04N21/64792, H04N21/84, H04L65/75, H04N21/25808, H04L47/25, H04N21/8456, H04N21/6587

Sector: Computing & AI

Outcome
Dismissed
Filed: Apr 22, 2024
First decided:
Language: German

The Court of Appeal dismissed AYLO's appeal against the Munich Local Division's rejection of AYLO's preliminary objection challenging UPC jurisdiction and competence. The Court of Appeal upheld UPC jurisdiction under Art. 7(2) Brussels I recast and Art. 71b(1) in conjunction with Art. 33(1)(a) UPCA, holding that jurisdiction exists where a European patent has effect in at least one Contracting Member State and alleged damage may occur there (including via internet access). The list of preliminary objections in R. 19.1 RoP is exhaustive; defences based on abusive procedural conduct and manifest lack of foundation are not admissible as preliminary objections.

Open on UPC Registry