UPClytics
Alle Fälle anzeigen

UPC CoA 227/2024

15. Mai 2024·EP2044709B1: CONNECTIVITY FAULT MANAGEMENT (CFM) IN NETWORKS WITH LINK AGGREGATION GROUP CONNECTIONS

Verfahrensdetails
Status
Case Closed
Verfahrensart
Berufung
Kategorie
Hauptberufung
Ergebnis in diesem Verfahren
Nur prozessual
Parteien
Kläger
Vertreter: Boris Kreye (Bird & Bird LLP); Lars Hessmann (Bird & Bird LLP); Christoph Walke (Cohausz & Florack); Lars Grannemann (Cohausz & Florack)
Beklagte
Vertreter: Thomas Lynker (TALIENS); Thomas Kurig (Becker, Kurig & Partner)
Division
Court of Appeal
Technology
Computing & AI
Sprache
English
Erste Entscheidung
21. Juni 2024
Letzte Entscheidung
17. Sept. 2024
Entscheidungen
  • 2024-09-17
    BerufungsentscheidungAppeal RoP220.2

    Court of Appeal ordered the stay of UPC revocation proceedings (UPC_CFI_484/2023) in Mala Technologies Ltd. v Nokia Technology GmbH concerning EP 2 044 709 (German part only), pending the outcome of parallel German Federal Patent Court/BGH revocation proceedings initiated by Nokia Solutions. Applying Art. 30 Brussels I recast Regulation, the court found that the causes of action in both proceedings are almost identical, the parties closely related, and the German proceedings at a more advanced stage. Mala's request for stay was upheld, and Nokia Technology's auxiliary request to limit the stay to the German part was rejected as moot.

    Rechtsfragen:Stay of UPC proceedings for lis pendens under Art. 30 Brussels I recast RegulationArt. 71c(2) Brussels I recast Regulation during UPCA transitional periodRelated actions before UPC and national courtPreliminary objection under Rule 19 RoP
  • 2024-06-21
    Appeal RoP220.2

    The Court of Appeal ruled on Mala Technologies Ltd.'s appeal against the Paris Central Division's order on a preliminary objection, and its associated request to stay first-instance proceedings pending appeal. The CoA held that a request to stay first-instance proceedings under R. 21.2 RoP must be 'reasoned' in the written statement; submissions first made at an interim conference cannot substitute for that written reasoning. Mala's request to stay was accordingly rejected. The order also summoned the parties to an oral hearing by videoconference.

    Rechtsfragen:Stay of first-instance proceedings pending appeal (R. 21.2 RoP)Reasoned request requirementPreliminary objection appealOral hearing by videoconference
Dokumente
DokumenttitelDatumÖffentlich
Acknowledgement-of-lodging2024-09-17Nicht öffentlich
Headnote-and-Keywords2024-09-17Nicht öffentlich
DecisionOutcome2024-09-17Nicht öffentlich
Final order2024-09-17Öffentlich
Hearing reference2024-07-26Nicht öffentlich
Hearing reference2024-07-26Nicht öffentlich
interimProcedureClosure2024-07-01Nicht öffentlich
summons2024-07-01Nicht öffentlich
Order oral hearing2024-07-01Öffentlich
Headnote-and-Keywords2024-06-21Nicht öffentlich
Order on stay request2024-06-21Öffentlich
Reference of Interim conference2024-06-17Nicht öffentlich
Reference of Interim conference2024-06-17Nicht öffentlich
Procedural order interim conference2024-06-06Öffentlich
Submission re Date of Interim Conference2024-06-04Nicht öffentlich
Preliminary procedural order2024-05-31Nicht öffentlich
interimConferenceDecisionAppeal2024-05-31Nicht öffentlich
Acknowledgement-of-lodging2024-05-29Nicht öffentlich
Statement of Response2024-05-29Nicht öffentlich
Notification Of Service2024-05-27Nicht öffentlich
Acknowledgement-of-lodging2024-05-17Nicht öffentlich
Acknowledgement of access to case2024-05-16Nicht öffentlich
Panel-Appointment2024-05-16Nicht öffentlich
Receipt2024-05-16Nicht öffentlich
Formal-checks_Notification-of-positive-outcome2024-05-16Nicht öffentlich
Acknowledgement-of-lodging2024-05-15Nicht öffentlich
240515 Statement of Appeal and Statement of Grounds of Appeal (signed)2024-05-15Nicht öffentlich
Exhibit D3 UPC Order2024-05-15Nicht öffentlich