UPClytics
Alle Fälle anzeigen

UPC CoA 227/2024

15. Mai 2024·EP2044709 · CONNECTIVITY FAULT MANAGEMENT (CFM) IN NETWORKS WITH LINK AGGREGATION GROUP CONNECTIONS

Verfahrensdetails
Status
Case Closed
Verfahrensart
Berufung
Kategorie
Hauptberufung
Parteien
Kläger
Vertreter
Beklagte
Vertreter
Division
Court of Appeal
Technologie
  • Electrical engineering
    Telecommunications · Digital communication
Sprache
English
Erste Entscheidung
21. Juni 2024
Letzte Entscheidung
17. Sept. 2024
Im Vergleich
Wie lange das Gericht bis zu einer ersten Entscheidung braucht.
Median Tage bis zur ersten Entscheidung
Gesamt-UPC124
Richter Klaus GrabinskiGesperrt
Richter Peter BlokGesperrt
Richter Emanuela GermanoGesperrt

Vor dem UPC: Mala Technologies Ltd. (4 Verfahren)·Nokia Group (30 Verfahren)

Entscheidungen
  • 2024-09-17
    Appeal RoP220.2Öffentlich

    Zusammenfassung: Court of Appeal ordered the stay of UPC revocation proceedings (UPC_CFI_484/2023) in Mala Technologies Ltd. v Nokia Technology GmbH concerning EP 2 044 709 (German part only), pending the outcome of parallel German Federal Patent Court/BGH revocation proceedings initiated by Nokia Solutions. Applying Art. 30 Brussels I recast Regulation, the court found that the causes of action in both proceedings are almost identical, the parties closely related, and the German proceedings at a more advanced stage. Mala's request for stay was upheld, and Nokia Technology's auxiliary request to limit the stay to the German part was rejected as moot.

    Rechtsfragen anzeigen (4)
    • Stay of UPC proceedings for lis pendens under Art. 30 Brussels I recast Regulation
    • Art. 71c(2) Brussels I recast Regulation during UPCA transitional period
    • Related actions before UPC and national court
    • Preliminary objection under Rule 19 RoP
  • 2024-06-21
    Appeal RoP220.2Öffentlich

    Zusammenfassung: The Court of Appeal ruled on Mala Technologies Ltd.'s appeal against the Paris Central Division's order on a preliminary objection, and its associated request to stay first-instance proceedings pending appeal. The CoA held that a request to stay first-instance proceedings under R. 21.2 RoP must be 'reasoned' in the written statement; submissions first made at an interim conference cannot substitute for that written reasoning. Mala's request to stay was accordingly rejected. The order also summoned the parties to an oral hearing by videoconference.

    Rechtsfragen anzeigen (4)
    • Stay of first-instance proceedings pending appeal (R. 21.2 RoP)
    • Reasoned request requirement
    • Preliminary objection appeal
    • Oral hearing by videoconference
DokumenttitelDatumÖffentlich
Acknowledgement-of-lodging2024-09-17Nicht öffentlich
Headnote-and-Keywords2024-09-17Nicht öffentlich
DecisionOutcome2024-09-17Nicht öffentlich
Final order2024-09-17Öffentlich
Hearing reference2024-07-26Nicht öffentlich
Hearing reference2024-07-26Nicht öffentlich
interimProcedureClosure2024-07-01Nicht öffentlich
summons2024-07-01Nicht öffentlich
Order oral hearing2024-07-01Öffentlich
Headnote-and-Keywords2024-06-21Nicht öffentlich