UPClytics
View all cases

UPC CoA 227/2024

May 15, 2024·EP2044709B1

Case details
Status
Case Closed
Action
Appeal
Category
Main Appeal
Parties
Claimants
Reps: Boris Kreye (Bird & Bird LLP); Lars Hessmann (Bird & Bird LLP); Christoph Walke (Cohausz & Florack); Lars Grannemann (Cohausz & Florack)
Respondents
Reps: Thomas Lynker (TALIENS); Thomas Kurig (Becker, Kurig & Partner)
Division
Court of Appeal
Language
English
First decided
Jun 21, 2024
Last decision
Sep 17, 2024
Decisions
  • 2024-09-17
    Appeal decisionAppeal RoP220.2

    Court of Appeal ordered the stay of UPC revocation proceedings (UPC_CFI_484/2023) in Mala Technologies Ltd. v Nokia Technology GmbH concerning EP 2 044 709 (German part only), pending the outcome of parallel German Federal Patent Court/BGH revocation proceedings initiated by Nokia Solutions. Applying Art. 30 Brussels I recast Regulation, the court found that the causes of action in both proceedings are almost identical, the parties closely related, and the German proceedings at a more advanced stage. Mala's request for stay was upheld, and Nokia Technology's auxiliary request to limit the stay to the German part was rejected as moot.

    Legal issues:Stay of UPC proceedings for lis pendens under Art. 30 Brussels I recast RegulationArt. 71c(2) Brussels I recast Regulation during UPCA transitional periodRelated actions before UPC and national courtPreliminary objection under Rule 19 RoP
  • 2024-06-21
    Appeal RoP220.2

    The Court of Appeal ruled on Mala Technologies Ltd.'s appeal against the Paris Central Division's order on a preliminary objection, and its associated request to stay first-instance proceedings pending appeal. The CoA held that a request to stay first-instance proceedings under R. 21.2 RoP must be 'reasoned' in the written statement; submissions first made at an interim conference cannot substitute for that written reasoning. Mala's request to stay was accordingly rejected. The order also summoned the parties to an oral hearing by videoconference.

    Legal issues:Stay of first-instance proceedings pending appeal (R. 21.2 RoP)Reasoned request requirementPreliminary objection appealOral hearing by videoconference
Documents
Document titleDatePublic
Acknowledgement-of-lodging2024-09-17Not public
Headnote-and-Keywords2024-09-17Not public
DecisionOutcome2024-09-17Not public
Final order2024-09-17Public
Hearing reference2024-07-26Not public
Hearing reference2024-07-26Not public
interimProcedureClosure2024-07-01Not public
summons2024-07-01Not public
Order oral hearing2024-07-01Public
Headnote-and-Keywords2024-06-21Not public
Order on stay request2024-06-21Public
Reference of Interim conference2024-06-17Not public
Reference of Interim conference2024-06-17Not public
Procedural order interim conference2024-06-06Public
Submission re Date of Interim Conference2024-06-04Not public
Preliminary procedural order2024-05-31Not public
interimConferenceDecisionAppeal2024-05-31Not public
Acknowledgement-of-lodging2024-05-29Not public
Statement of Response2024-05-29Not public
Notification Of Service2024-05-27Not public
Acknowledgement-of-lodging2024-05-17Not public
Acknowledgement of access to case2024-05-16Not public
Panel-Appointment2024-05-16Not public
Receipt2024-05-16Not public
Formal-checks_Notification-of-positive-outcome2024-05-16Not public
Acknowledgement-of-lodging2024-05-15Not public
240515 Statement of Appeal and Statement of Grounds of Appeal (signed)2024-05-15Not public
Exhibit D3 UPC Order2024-05-15Not public