UPClytics
View all cases

UPC CoA 227/2024

May 15, 2024·EP2044709 · CONNECTIVITY FAULT MANAGEMENT (CFM) IN NETWORKS WITH LINK AGGREGATION GROUP CONNECTIONS

Case details
Status
Case Closed
Action
Appeal
Category
Main appeal
Parties
Claimants
Representatives
Respondents
Representatives
Division
Court of Appeal
Technology
  • Electrical engineering
    Telecommunications · Digital communication
Language
English
First decided
Jun 21, 2024
Last decision
Sep 17, 2024
How this compares
How long the court takes to reach a first decision.
Median days to first decision
All UPC124
Judge Klaus GrabinskiLocked
Judge Peter BlokLocked
Judge Emanuela GermanoLocked

At the UPC: Mala Technologies Ltd. (4 cases)·Nokia Group (30 cases)

Decisions
  • 2024-09-17
    Appeal RoP220.2Public

    Summary: Court of Appeal ordered the stay of UPC revocation proceedings (UPC_CFI_484/2023) in Mala Technologies Ltd. v Nokia Technology GmbH concerning EP 2 044 709 (German part only), pending the outcome of parallel German Federal Patent Court/BGH revocation proceedings initiated by Nokia Solutions. Applying Art. 30 Brussels I recast Regulation, the court found that the causes of action in both proceedings are almost identical, the parties closely related, and the German proceedings at a more advanced stage. Mala's request for stay was upheld, and Nokia Technology's auxiliary request to limit the stay to the German part was rejected as moot.

    Show the legal issues (4)
    • Stay of UPC proceedings for lis pendens under Art. 30 Brussels I recast Regulation
    • Art. 71c(2) Brussels I recast Regulation during UPCA transitional period
    • Related actions before UPC and national court
    • Preliminary objection under Rule 19 RoP
  • 2024-06-21
    Appeal RoP220.2Public

    Summary: The Court of Appeal ruled on Mala Technologies Ltd.'s appeal against the Paris Central Division's order on a preliminary objection, and its associated request to stay first-instance proceedings pending appeal. The CoA held that a request to stay first-instance proceedings under R. 21.2 RoP must be 'reasoned' in the written statement; submissions first made at an interim conference cannot substitute for that written reasoning. Mala's request to stay was accordingly rejected. The order also summoned the parties to an oral hearing by videoconference.

    Show the legal issues (4)
    • Stay of first-instance proceedings pending appeal (R. 21.2 RoP)
    • Reasoned request requirement
    • Preliminary objection appeal
    • Oral hearing by videoconference
Document titleDatePublic
Acknowledgement-of-lodging2024-09-17Not public
Headnote-and-Keywords2024-09-17Not public
DecisionOutcome2024-09-17Not public
Final order2024-09-17Public
Hearing reference2024-07-26Not public
Hearing reference2024-07-26Not public
interimProcedureClosure2024-07-01Not public
summons2024-07-01Not public
Order oral hearing2024-07-01Public
Headnote-and-Keywords2024-06-21Not public