UPC CoA 227/2024
May 15, 2024·EP2044709 · CONNECTIVITY FAULT MANAGEMENT (CFM) IN NETWORKS WITH LINK AGGREGATION GROUP CONNECTIONS
- Case details
- StatusCase ClosedActionAppealCategoryMain appeal
- Parties
- Claimants
- Mala Technologies Ltd.Other / unknown
Representatives- Thomas Lynker-TALIENS
- Thomas Kurig-Becker, Kurig & Partner
Respondents- Nokia Technology GmbHOperating co.
Representatives- Boris Kreye-Bird & Bird LLP
- Lars Hessmann-Bird & Bird LLP
- Christoph Walke-Cohausz & Florack
- Lars Grannemann-Cohausz & Florack
- Division
- Court of Appeal
- Technology
- Electrical engineeringTelecommunications · Digital communication
- Language
- English
- First decided
- Jun 21, 2024
- Last decision
- Sep 17, 2024
| Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|
| All UPC | 124 |
| Judge Klaus Grabinski | Locked |
| Judge Peter Blok | Locked |
| Judge Emanuela Germano | Locked |
At the UPC: Mala Technologies Ltd. (4 cases)·Nokia Group (30 cases)
This dispute contains 3 other proceedings
Start a free trial to see how each one ended.
More cases: Court of Appeal·2024
- 2024-09-17Appeal RoP220.2Public
Summary: Court of Appeal ordered the stay of UPC revocation proceedings (UPC_CFI_484/2023) in Mala Technologies Ltd. v Nokia Technology GmbH concerning EP 2 044 709 (German part only), pending the outcome of parallel German Federal Patent Court/BGH revocation proceedings initiated by Nokia Solutions. Applying Art. 30 Brussels I recast Regulation, the court found that the causes of action in both proceedings are almost identical, the parties closely related, and the German proceedings at a more advanced stage. Mala's request for stay was upheld, and Nokia Technology's auxiliary request to limit the stay to the German part was rejected as moot.
Show the legal issues (4)
- Stay of UPC proceedings for lis pendens under Art. 30 Brussels I recast Regulation
- Art. 71c(2) Brussels I recast Regulation during UPCA transitional period
- Related actions before UPC and national court
- Preliminary objection under Rule 19 RoP
- 2024-06-21Appeal RoP220.2Public
Summary: The Court of Appeal ruled on Mala Technologies Ltd.'s appeal against the Paris Central Division's order on a preliminary objection, and its associated request to stay first-instance proceedings pending appeal. The CoA held that a request to stay first-instance proceedings under R. 21.2 RoP must be 'reasoned' in the written statement; submissions first made at an interim conference cannot substitute for that written reasoning. Mala's request to stay was accordingly rejected. The order also summoned the parties to an oral hearing by videoconference.
Show the legal issues (4)
- Stay of first-instance proceedings pending appeal (R. 21.2 RoP)
- Reasoned request requirement
- Preliminary objection appeal
- Oral hearing by videoconference
| Document title | Date | Public |
|---|---|---|
| Acknowledgement-of-lodging | 2024-09-17 | Not public |
| Headnote-and-Keywords | 2024-09-17 | Not public |
| DecisionOutcome | 2024-09-17 | Not public |
| Final order | 2024-09-17 | Public |
| Hearing reference | 2024-07-26 | Not public |
| Hearing reference | 2024-07-26 | Not public |
| interimProcedureClosure | 2024-07-01 | Not public |
| summons | 2024-07-01 | Not public |
| Order oral hearing | 2024-07-01 | Public |
| Headnote-and-Keywords | 2024-06-21 | Not public |