Übersicht · Eingereicht: 20. Feb. 2026
UPC_CoA_34/2026
FLUID DELIVERY DEVICE WITH TRANSCUTANEOUS ACCESS TOOL, INSERTION MECHANISM AND BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING FOR USE THEREWITH
BerufungenHauptberufungCourt of AppealAppealCase Closed
Dieser Fall zitiert
In den Entscheidungen dieses Falls zitierte Quellen.
Verfahrensordnung · 4
| Quelle | Rechtsfrage | Bindungskraft | Auszug |
|---|---|---|---|
| 220.3 | jurisdiction | Bindend | concerning a request for discretionary review (R. 220.3 RoP) |
| 262.2 | jurisdiction | Bindend | EOFlow filed two applications under R. 262.2 RoP regarding information related to business agreements with Menarini. |
| 262A | jurisdiction | Bindend | dismissed the R. 262.2 and 262A RoP requests of the parties |
| 354.4 | jurisdiction | Bindend | The imposition of a penalty is subject to appeal under R. 354.4. Leave to appeal the order on confidentiality issues is granted |
UPC-Berufungsgericht · 3
| Quelle | Rechtsfrage | Bindungskraft | Auszug |
|---|---|---|---|
| UPC_CoA_768/2024 | infringement by equivalents | Bindend | On 30 April 2025 (UPC_CoA_768/2024 APL_64374/2024 ORD_69078/2024, "the order on provisional measures") the Court of Appeal found that the attacked embodiments infringe Insulet's patent |
| UPC_CoA_651/2024 | jurisdiction | Überzeugend | in accordance with the ratio of the decision in Total vs. Texas Instruments (CoA, 14 January 2025, CoA_651/2024) there are cases in which R. 220.3 RoP applies regardless of whether the specific requirements of that rule are met |
| UPC_CoA_930/2025 | jurisdiction | Bindend | On 4 February 2026 the Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal against the penalty order and the cost order (UPC_CoA_930/2025). |
EPÜ-Artikel · 2
| Quelle | Rechtsfrage | Bindungskraft | Auszug |
|---|---|---|---|
| Article 73(2)(b) UPCA | jurisdiction | Bindend | Art. 73 (2), (b) UPCA empowers the Court of Appeal to grant leave to appeal itself. |
| Article 58 UPCA | jurisdiction | Bindend | EOFlow requests that the Court of Appeal classify specific information as confidential within the meaning of Art. 58 UPCA, R. 262 RoP |
UPC (Erstinstanz) · 1
| Quelle | Rechtsfrage | Bindungskraft | Auszug |
|---|---|---|---|
| UPC_CFI_1167/2025 | jurisdiction | Hintergrund | Milan Central Division, 4 December 2025, in an application for determination of penalty payments, UPC_CFI_1167/2025 |
Zitiert in
Spätere UPC-Entscheidungen, die diesen Fall zitieren.
Bisher in keiner anderen Entscheidung unseres Korpus zitiert.