UPC Analytics
DEEN
Übersicht · Eingereicht: 12. Mai 2025

UPC_CoA_424/2025

FINING OF BOROALUMINO SILICATE GLASSES

BerufungenHauptberufungCourt of AppealAppealCase Closed
  • 2025-05-14Abgewiesenappeal_decisionRequest for a discretionary review (RoP 220.3)

    The Court of Appeal (Standing Judge Patricia Rombach) dismissed Hisense, TCL, and LG's request for discretionary review (R. 220.3 RoP) and application for suspensive effect in the Corning v. Hisense/TCL/LG infringement proceedings (EP 3 296 274) before the Mannheim Local Division. The Court upheld the judge-rapporteur's refusal to separate proceedings for the competing defendant groups. Separation of proceedings is not required to protect confidential supply chain information; R. 262A RoP confidentiality orders offer an adequate alternative. The applications for suspensive effect were dismissed.