UPClytics
Alle Fälle anzeigen

UPC CoA 810/2024

13. Dez. 2024·EP2697391 +1 more: METHOD AND PRODUCT FOR LOCALISED OR SPATIAL DETECTION OF NUCLEIC ACID IN A TISSUE SAMPLE

Verfahrensdetails
Status
Case Closed
Verfahrensart
Allgemein
Kategorie
Hauptberufung
Parteien
Kläger
Vertreter: Tilman Mueller-Stoy (Bardehle Pagenberg); Axel Berger (Bardehle Pagenberg)
Beklagte
Vertreter: Cameron Marshall (Carpmaels & Ransford); Agathe Michel-De Cazotte (Carpmaels & Ransford)
Division
Court of Appeal
Technology
Biotechnology
Sprache
English
Entscheidungen
  • 2024-12-17
    AbgewiesenApplication Rop 223

    The Court of Appeal (standing judge) dismissed Curio Bioscience Inc.'s application for suspensive effect (R. 223.4 RoP) of a Düsseldorf Local Division order requiring Curio to provide security for costs of EUR 200,000 in favour of claimant 10x Genomics Inc. The standing judge held that Curio had not established 'extreme urgency' as required under R. 223 RoP, which is a condition for a standing-judge decision without hearing the respondent.

    Rechtsfragen:Application for suspensive effect (R. 223.4 RoP)Extreme urgency requirementSecurity for costs (R. 158 RoP / Art. 41(1) UPCA)
Dokumente
DokumenttitelDatumÖffentlich
action.phaseChange.caseClose2025-10-24Nicht öffentlich
Outcome of the Order2024-12-17Nicht öffentlich
Order2024-12-17Öffentlich
Panel-Appointment2024-12-16Nicht öffentlich
Receipt2024-12-16Nicht öffentlich
Exhibit2024-12-16Nicht öffentlich
Application2024-12-16Nicht öffentlich