UPClytics
View all cases

UPC CoA 810/2024

Dec 13, 2024·EP2697391 +1 more: METHOD AND PRODUCT FOR LOCALISED OR SPATIAL DETECTION OF NUCLEIC ACID IN A TISSUE SAMPLE

Case details
Status
Case Closed
Action
Generic
Category
Main Appeal
Parties
Claimants
Reps: Tilman Mueller-Stoy (Bardehle Pagenberg); Axel Berger (Bardehle Pagenberg)
Respondents
Reps: Cameron Marshall (Carpmaels & Ransford); Agathe Michel-De Cazotte (Carpmaels & Ransford)
Division
Court of Appeal
Technology
Biotechnology
Language
English
Decisions
  • 2024-12-17
    DismissedApplication Rop 223

    The Court of Appeal (standing judge) dismissed Curio Bioscience Inc.'s application for suspensive effect (R. 223.4 RoP) of a Düsseldorf Local Division order requiring Curio to provide security for costs of EUR 200,000 in favour of claimant 10x Genomics Inc. The standing judge held that Curio had not established 'extreme urgency' as required under R. 223 RoP, which is a condition for a standing-judge decision without hearing the respondent.

    Legal issues:Application for suspensive effect (R. 223.4 RoP)Extreme urgency requirementSecurity for costs (R. 158 RoP / Art. 41(1) UPCA)
Documents
Document titleDatePublic
action.phaseChange.caseClose2025-10-24Not public
Outcome of the Order2024-12-17Not public
Order2024-12-17Public
Panel-Appointment2024-12-16Not public
Receipt2024-12-16Not public
Exhibit2024-12-16Not public
Application2024-12-16Not public