UPC_CoA_883/2025

METHOD AND MEANS FOR BROWSING BY WALKING

BerufungenHauptberufungCourt of AppealGenericCase Closed

Dieser Fall zitiert

In den Entscheidungen dieses Falls zitierte Quellen.

Quelle	Rechtsfrage	Bindungskraft	Auszug
247	grounds for rehearing — fundamental procedural defect	Bindend	R. 247(e and d) RoP (fundamental procedural defect)
245	application for rehearing	Bindend	Rehearing (Art. 81(1) UPCA; R. 245 RoP); fundamental procedural defect
350	decision must contain grounds, facts and arguments	Bindend	A decision of the Court shall contain the grounds for the decision and a statement of the facts and arguments on which the Court bases its decision (R. 350 RoP).
248.1	admissibility of rehearing application — prior objection requirement	Bindend	According to R. 248.1 RoP, an Application for rehearing based on the ground of a fundamental procedural defect is only admissible where an objection in respect of the procedural defect was raised during the proceedings...

Quelle	Rechtsfrage	Bindungskraft	Auszug
81	fundamental procedural defect as ground for rehearing	Bindend	Requests for a rehearing based on a fundamental procedural defect pursuant to Art. 81(1)(b) UPCA and R. 247(e and d) RoP (fundamental procedural defect)
76	right to be heard — decisions may only be based on grounds submitted by parties	Bindend	The right to be heard is reflected in Art. 76(2) UPCA, which provides that decisions on the merits may only be based on grounds, facts and evidence, which were submitted by the parties...
76	free evaluation of evidence by the court	Bindend	The Court shall evaluate the evidence presented by the parties freely and independently (Art. 76(3) UPCA).

Quelle	Rechtsfrage	Bindungskraft	Auszug
UPC_CoA_596/2025	prior CoA order (security for costs) under review for rehearing	Hintergrund	Order of the Court of Appeal of the Unified Patent Court dated 12 July 2025, UPC_CoA_596/2025
UPC_CoA_363/2025	prior CoA decision (default) under review for rehearing	Hintergrund	Decision of the Court of Appeal of the Unified Patent Court dated 12 July 2025, UPC_CoA_363/2025

Quelle	Rechtsfrage	Bindungskraft	Auszug
C-129/13	fundamental procedural defect standard — same decision without defect	Bindend	see judgment of 3 July 2014 in Kamino International Logistics and Datema Hellmann Worldwide Logistics, C-129/13 and C130/13, EU:C:2014:2041, paragraph 79

Zitiert in

Spätere UPC-Entscheidungen, die diesen Fall zitieren.

Bisher in keiner anderen Entscheidung unseres Korpus zitiert.