UPC Analytics
DEEN
Übersicht · Eingereicht: 30. Okt. 2025

UPC_CoA_897/2025

SYSTEM FOR SECURING SHELF ACCESSORIES TO A SHELF

BerufungenHauptberufungCourt of AppealGenericCase Closed
Dieser Fall zitiert
In den Entscheidungen dieses Falls zitierte Quellen.

Verfahrensordnung · 3

QuelleRechtsfrageBindungskraftAuszug
223application for suspensive effectBindendconcerning an application for suspensive effect (R. 223 RoP)
118.8enforcement of order / communication of informationBindendHL Display lodged a R. 118.8 RoP application on 16 October 2025 seeking the enforcement of (among other items) the part of the decision
191communication of information — reasoned requestHintergrundHL Display has never made a reasoned request in the sense of R. 191 RoP, and the information is not reasonably necessary for the purpose of advancing HL Display's case.

EPÜ-Artikel · 2

QuelleRechtsfrageBindungskraftAuszug
74appeal does not have suspensive effect by defaultBindendPursuant to Article 74(1) UPCA, an appeal shall not have suspensive effect unless the Court of Appeal decides otherwise at the motivated request of one of the parties.
67right to information — scopeBindendCategories d ‐ f do not have any basis in Art. 67 UPCA and thus cannot be awarded based on this legal provision.
Zitiert in
Spätere UPC-Entscheidungen, die diesen Fall zitieren.

Bisher in keiner anderen Entscheidung unseres Korpus zitiert.