UPC Analytics
DEEN
Übersicht · Eingereicht: 19. Dez. 2025

UPC_CoA_930/2025

FLUID DELIVERY DEVICE WITH TRANSCUTANEOUS ACCESS TOOL, INSERTION MECHANISM AND BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING FOR USE THEREWITH

BerufungenHauptberufungCourt of AppealAppealCase Closed
Dieser Fall zitiert
In den Entscheidungen dieses Falls zitierte Quellen.

UPC-Berufungsgericht · 6

QuelleRechtsfrageBindungskraftAuszug
UPC_CoA_523/2024jurisdictionBindendsee decision of 19 December 2025, UPC_CoA_523/2024, Docket Navigator, paragraphs 18-19 with references
UPC_CoA_9/2026jurisdictionBindendit is, as far as relevant here, a source of law on which the Court shall base its decisions by virtue of Art. 24(1)(d) UPCA (decision of 24 February 2026, UPC_CoA_9/2026, Gowling, paragraph 19)
UPC_CoA_70/2025jurisdictionBindendcf. Art. 58 UPCA: "for the protection of trade secrets, personal data or other confidential information", CoA, 1 August 2025, UPC_CoA_70/202, Strabag v Swarco Futurit et al., para. 17
UPC_CoA_768/2024infringement by equivalentsBindendIn its order in preliminary injunction proceedings of 30 April 2025 initiated by Insulet (UPC_CoA_768/2024, APL_64374/2024, ORD_69078/2024)
UPC_CoA_699/2025confidentiality of information communicated pursuant to court orderBindendsee CoA 14 October 2025, UPC_CoA_699/2025, Kodak v Fujifilm, para. 45
UPC_CoA_70/2025R.262.2 RoP grant does not automatically restrict other party's use of informationBindendGranting a request under R. 262.2 RoP does not automatically lead to protection against the other party disclosing the information (CoA, 1 August 2025, UPC_CoA_70/2025, Strabag v Swarco Futurit et al. para. 19).

Verfahrensordnung · 5

QuelleRechtsfrageBindungskraftAuszug
262.2jurisdictionBindendconcerning an appeal against an order denying a request under R. 262.2 RoP
262AjurisdictionBindendTrade secrets or other confidential information lose their character as trade secrets or other confidential information if they are disclosed to the other party without an order pursuant to R. 262A RoP
262.2confidentiality request for written pleadingsBindendR. 262A RoP applies at least mutatis mutandis.
191communication of confidential informationBindendinformation which has to be communicated according to a Court order or decision (see CoA 14 October 2025, UPC_CoA_699/2025, Kodak v Fujifilm, para. 45). R. 262A RoP applies at least mutatis mutandis.
262Aapplication to restrict use of confidential informationBindendPursuant to R. 262A RoP, a party may make an Application to the Court for an order that certain information contained in its pleadings or the collection and use of evidence in proceedings may be restricted

EuGH · 4

QuelleRechtsfrageBindungskraftAuszug
T-718/15jurisdictionÜberzeugendWhere there are EU rules in a sphere concerned by the TRIPS Agreement, EU law will apply (General Court, judgment of 5 February 2018, PTC Therapeutics International v EMA, T-718/15, EU:T:2018:66, para 62)
C-927/19jurisdictionBindendCJEU, judgment of 7 September 2021, Klaipėdos regiono atliekų tvarkymo centras, C-927/19, EU:C:2021:700, at para 97
C-300/98jurisdictionBindendthe TRIPS Agreement does not have direct effect under EU law (judgment of 14 December 2000, Dior and Others, joined cases C-300/98 and C-392/98, EU:C:2000:688, para. 44)
C-341/24jurisdictionBindendAll the UPC Contracting Member States are, as EU Member States, parties to the TRIPS Agreement (judgment of 11 September 2025, Duca di Salaparuta, C-341/24, EU:C:2025:693, para 6)

EPÜ-Artikel · 4

QuelleRechtsfrageBindungskraftAuszug
Article 58 UPCAjurisdictionBindendArt. 58 UPCA: "for the protection of trade secrets, personal data or other confidential information"
Article 24(1)(d) UPCAjurisdictionBindendit is a source of law on which the Court shall base its decisions by virtue of Art. 24(1)(d) UPCA
67communication of confidential information pursuant to court orderBindendinformation received as a result of the other party's compliance with an order to communicate information pursuant to Art. 67 UPCA and R. 191 RoP
58court power to restrict collection and use of evidenceBindendPursuant to Art. 58 UPCA, the Court may, to protect the trade secrets, personal data, or other confidential information of a party to the proceedings...

courtName.other · 3

QuelleRechtsfrageBindungskraftAuszug
Art. 39(2) TRIPSjurisdictionBindendsubject to reasonable steps under the circumstances, by the person lawfully in control of the information, to keep it secret (see Art. 39 (2) TRIPS Agreement)
Directive 2016/943jurisdictionBindenddirective 2016/943 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on the protection of undisclosed know-how and business information (trade secrets) against their unlawful acquisition
Art. 39(2) TRIPSdefinition of trade secretHintergrundThe classification of information as a trade secret requires that (a) the information is not... generally known... (see Art. 39 (2) TRIPS Agreement).

UPC (Erstinstanz) · 1

QuelleRechtsfrageBindungskraftAuszug
UPC_CFI_1167/2025jurisdictionHintergrundMilan Central Division, 4 December 2025, UPC_CFI_1167/2025
Zitiert in
Spätere UPC-Entscheidungen, die diesen Fall zitieren.
Zitiert inDatumRechtsfrageBindungskraftAuszug
UPC_CoA_34/2026

Court of Appeal

26. Feb. 2026jurisdictionBindendOn 4 February 2026 the Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal against the penalty order and the cost order (UPC_CoA_930/2025).