UPC Analytics
ENDE
Analytics1Cases1Decisions4Judges5Parties2Firms
Filing trendsOutcomesPendencyTechnologyForum strategyLeading casesLegal issuesSecurity for costs

Legal issues

Cross-cutting view of legal principles, recurring arguments, and the prior art the court relies on.

Legal principleinadmissibility of late new arguments under Rule 9.2 RoP even on the same broad issueClear all

Filtering to principle: inadmissibility of late new arguments under Rule 9.2 RoP even on the same broad issue

Clear principle filter
Most-litigated legal principles
Recurring legal principles across 1 cases with reasoning extracted. Success rate counts patentee-favorable outcomes only.
PrincipleCasesDecidedPatentee success
front-loaded procedure under rop110%
inadmissibility of late new arguments under rule 9.2 rop even on the same broad issue110%
revocation of patent claim as counterclaim defeats infringement action110%
Most-rejected arguments
Arguments that the UPC has not accepted, ranked by repeat occurrences across cases.
ArgumentPartyCases
new line of arguments on added matter based on different passages of a lengthy document should be admittedClaimant1
Most-cited prior art
References relied on across substantive merits cases, with the role they typically play.

No prior-art data in the current scope.