UPC Analytics
ENDE
Analytics1Cases2Decisions3Judges2Parties2Firms
Filing trendsOutcomesPendencyTechnologyForum strategyLeading casesLegal issuesSecurity for costs

Legal issues

Cross-cutting view of legal principles, recurring arguments, and the prior art the court relies on.

Legal principlemootness of application after defendant issues cease-and-desist undertakingClear all

Filtering to principle: mootness of application after defendant issues cease-and-desist undertaking

Clear principle filter
Most-litigated legal principles
Recurring legal principles across 1 cases with reasoning extracted. Success rate counts patentee-favorable outcomes only.
PrincipleCasesDecidedPatentee success
anti-anti-suit injunction (aasi) and anti-anti-enforcement injunction (aaei) in upc proceedings110%
prior warning not required before aasi/aaei where defendant has commenced foreign anti-suit proceedings110%
mootness of application after defendant issues cease-and-desist undertaking110%
costs in moot proceedings: defendant bears costs if it gave cause for litigation110%
objective assessment of necessity for proceedings from applicant's perspective at time of filing110%
Most-rejected arguments
Arguments that the UPC has not accepted, ranked by repeat occurrences across cases.
ArgumentPartyCases
applicant should bear its own costs because it failed to issue a prior warning before filing the anti-anti-suit/anti-anti-enforcement injunctionRespondent1
Most-cited prior art
References relied on across substantive merits cases, with the role they typically play.

No prior-art data in the current scope.