UPC Analytics
ENDE
Analytics1Cases2Decisions3Judges2Parties2Firms
Filing trendsOutcomesPendencyTechnologyForum strategyLeading casesLegal issuesSecurity for costs

Legal issues

Cross-cutting view of legal principles, recurring arguments, and the prior art the court relies on.

Legal principleobjective assessment of necessity for proceedings from applicant's perspective at time of filingClear all

Filtering to principle: objective assessment of necessity for proceedings from applicant's perspective at time of filing

Clear principle filter
Most-litigated legal principles
Recurring legal principles across 1 cases with reasoning extracted. Success rate counts patentee-favorable outcomes only.
PrincipleCasesDecidedPatentee success
anti-anti-suit injunction (aasi) and anti-anti-enforcement injunction (aaei) in upc proceedings110%
prior warning not required before aasi/aaei where defendant has commenced foreign anti-suit proceedings110%
mootness of application after defendant issues cease-and-desist undertaking110%
costs in moot proceedings: defendant bears costs if it gave cause for litigation110%
objective assessment of necessity for proceedings from applicant's perspective at time of filing110%
Most-rejected arguments
Arguments that the UPC has not accepted, ranked by repeat occurrences across cases.
ArgumentPartyCases
applicant should bear its own costs because it failed to issue a prior warning before filing the anti-anti-suit/anti-anti-enforcement injunctionRespondent1
Most-cited prior art
References relied on across substantive merits cases, with the role they typically play.

No prior-art data in the current scope.