UPC Analytics
ENDE
Overview · Filed:

ACT_6395/2025

MOTION PREDICTION IN VIDEO CODING

Procedural & sub-applicationsCosts AssessmentsParis CDApplication For Costs
Parties

Claimants

  • Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd.
Reps: Pauline Debré (Linklaters LLP)

Respondents

  • Photon Wave Co., Ltd.
Reps: Andreas Oser (Prüfer & Partner); Peter Kleim (Prüfer & Partner)
Judges

French-seated division — individual judges anonymized.

  • Panel member (anonymized)Legally qualified judge, judge-rapporteur
Patents
  • EP 2 661 892
CPC codes: H04N19/182, H04N19/577, H04N19/50, H04N19/184, H04N19/523, H04N19/176, H04N19/105, H04N19/42

Sector: Telecommunications

Outcome
Costs only
Filed:
First decided: Jul 27, 2025
Language:

Central Division Paris issued a costs decision in Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd. v. Photon Wave Co., Ltd. following a preliminary objection in a revocation action. The court held: (1) a separate cost decision under R. 150 RoP is admissible after a preliminary objection that closes the proceedings before that division (jurisdiction declined and case transferred to Paris Local Division); (2) value of the revocation action set at EUR 500,000; (3) value of the preliminary objection proceedings set at one-quarter of the revocation action value (EUR 125,000); (4) expert costs for an opinion on Art. 33(4) UPCA interpretation were not reimbursable. Photon Wave bears 80% of Seoul Viosys's recoverable costs for the preliminary objection.