ACT 7605/2025

—·EP3466498 +1 more: SEARCH DEVICE FOR AVALANCHE VICTIMS AND METHOD FOR OPERATING A SEARCH DEVICE FOR AVALANCHE VICTIMS

Case details: Status
—
Action
Application for costs
Category
Costs Assessments
Parties: Claimants
Ortovox Sportartikel GmbH
Reps: Miriam Kiefer (Kather Augenstein); Robert Knaps (Kather Augenstein); Michael Siebel (Hofstetter, Schurack & Partner)
Respondents
Mammut Sports Group AG
Mammut Sports Group GmbH
Reps: Oliver Jan Jüngst (Bird & Bird LLP); Moritz Schroeder (Bird & Bird LLP); Alexander Bothe (Bird & Bird LLP); Fabian Leimgruber (Thomann Fischer)
Division: Dusseldorf LD
Judges: —
Technology: Computing & AI
Language: —
First decided: Apr 22, 2025

Decisions

2025-04-22
Costs onlyCostsApplication For Costs
Decision by Düsseldorf Local Division (UPC_CFI_16/2024, 22 April 2025) on costs assessment (Kostenfestsetzung) following Ortovox's successful infringement action against Mammut for EP 3 466 498 B1. The court ruled that using multiple attorneys is permissible for cost recovery purposes where no duplicate costs are generated; PI costs and main proceedings costs have separate caps and are separately reimbursable.
Legal issues:Costs assessment (Art. 69 UPCA, R. 150-152 RoP)Multiple attorneys: reimbursabilitySeparate cost caps: PI vs main proceedings
Damages: Liability declared, amount deferred

Documents