UPClytics
ENDE
Sign inStart trial
View all cases

ACT 7605/2025

EP3466498 +1 more · SEARCH DEVICE FOR AVALANCHE VICTIMS AND METHOD FOR OPERATING A SEARCH DEVICE FOR AVALANCHE VICTIMS

Follow
Case details
Status
—
Action
Application for costs
Category
Costs assessments
Parties
Claimants
Representatives
Respondents
Representatives
Patents
Division
Dusseldorf LD
Judges
—
Technology
  • Electrical engineering
    Semiconductors
  • Other fields
    Consumer products
Language
—
First decided
Apr 22, 2025
How this compares
How long the court takes to reach a first decision.
Median days to first decision
All UPC124
Dusseldorf LDLocked

At the UPC: Ortovox Sportartikel GmbH (22 cases)·Mammut Group (22 cases)

Start 14-day free trialAlready a user? Sign in
Related cases

This dispute contains 19 other proceedings

UPC CoA 216/2025·UPC CoA 217/2025·UPC CoA 228/2025·UPC CFI 121/2025·UPC CFI 124/2025 and 14 more

13 other defendants litigating the same or a related patent

UPC CoA 380/2025·UPC CFI 258/2025·UPC CFI 823/2024·UPC CFI 824/2024·UPC CFI 677/2024 and 8 more

Start a free trial to see how each one ended.

More cases: Dusseldorf LD·2025

Decisions
  • 2025-04-22
    Application For CostsPublic

    Summary: Decision by Düsseldorf Local Division (UPC_CFI_16/2024, 22 April 2025) on costs assessment (Kostenfestsetzung) following Ortovox's successful infringement action against Mammut for EP 3 466 498 B1. The court ruled that using multiple attorneys is permissible for cost recovery purposes where no duplicate costs are generated; PI costs and main proceedings costs have separate caps and are separately reimbursable.

    Show the legal issues (3)
    • Costs assessment (Art. 69 UPCA, R. 150-152 RoP)
    • Multiple attorneys: reimbursability
    • Separate cost caps: PI vs main proceedings
Documents
  • 93C63660FB1A2AEAE0AB644C77C900E4_de.pdf2025-04-22DE