APL_588422/2023

VAPORIZATION DEVICE SYSTEMS AND METHODS

AppealsMain AppealCourt of AppealAppeal RoP220.2—

This case cites

Authorities cited within the decisions on file for this case.

Target	Legal point	Strength	Excerpt
242.1	costs	Binding	Rule 242.1 RoP is to be interpreted to mean that if the decision of the Court of Appeal is not a final order or decision concluding an action, the Court of Appeal, in the case at hand, will not issue an order for costs
8.5	party identification	Binding	it must have been clear to the appellant that the statements were directed against it, see Rule 8.5(a), (c), 8.6 and Rule 42 RoP

Target	Legal point	Strength	Excerpt
69	costs	Binding	when, in the final decision on the action at hand, the Court determines whether and to what extent a party must bear the costs of the other party because it was unsuccessful within the meaning of Article 69 UPCA.

Cited by

Subsequent UPC decisions citing this case.

Not yet cited in another decision in our corpus.