UPClytics
View all cases

ORD 25617/2024

·EP3096315: DEVICE AND METHOD FOR EXECUTION OF HUFFMAN CODING

Case details
Status
Action
Procedural application
Category
Case Management Orders
Division
Mannheim LD
Judges
Language
First decided
May 6, 2024
Decisions
  • 2024-05-06
    Rule 264 Order

    The Mannheim Local Division issued a procedural order separating the infringement proceedings against Xiaomi defendants 1, 2, 7 and 8 (Chinese/HK entities to whom the statement of claim had not yet been served) from the proceedings against the other defendants (3–6, 9, 10) in Panasonic v Xiaomi (UPC_CFI_218/2023, EP 3 096 315). The separation under R. 303.2 RoP was ordered because the European defendants' representatives had not been mandated by the Chinese/HK defendants, and no service authorisation for the Chinese entities via the European affiliates existed.

    Legal issues:Separation of proceedings under R. 303.2 RoPService of claim on defendants outside Contracting Member StatesService authorisation via group companies
Documents
  • E467E8FFB78D672D8924BD846A42C907_de.pdf2024-05-06DE
Panasonic Holdings Corporation v Xiaomi Inc. — UPC ORD 25617/2024 | UPClytics