View all cases
ORD 25617/2024
—·EP3096315: DEVICE AND METHOD FOR EXECUTION OF HUFFMAN CODING
- Case details
- Status—ActionProcedural applicationCategoryCase Management Orders
- Parties
- Division
- Mannheim LD
- Judges
- Peter Tochtermann · Presiding Judge and Judge-Rapporteur
- Language
- —
- First decided
- May 6, 2024
Decisions
- 2024-05-06Rule 264 Order
The Mannheim Local Division issued a procedural order separating the infringement proceedings against Xiaomi defendants 1, 2, 7 and 8 (Chinese/HK entities to whom the statement of claim had not yet been served) from the proceedings against the other defendants (3–6, 9, 10) in Panasonic v Xiaomi (UPC_CFI_218/2023, EP 3 096 315). The separation under R. 303.2 RoP was ordered because the European defendants' representatives had not been mandated by the Chinese/HK defendants, and no service authorisation for the Chinese entities via the European affiliates existed.
Legal issues:Separation of proceedings under R. 303.2 RoPService of claim on defendants outside Contracting Member StatesService authorisation via group companies
Documents
- E467E8FFB78D672D8924BD846A42C907_de.pdf2024-05-06DE