UPClytics
View all cases

ORD 25617/2024

EP3096315 SEP · DEVICE AND METHOD FOR EXECUTION OF HUFFMAN CODING

Case details
Status
—
Action
Procedural application
Category
Case management orders
Parties
Claimants
Representatives
Division
Mannheim LD
Technology
  • Electrical engineering
    Computer technology
Language
—
First decided
May 6, 2024
How this compares
How long the court takes to reach a first decision.
Median days to first decision
All UPC124
Mannheim LDLocked
Judge Peter TochtermannLocked

At the UPC: Panasonic Group (81 cases)·Xiaomi Group (92 cases)

Decisions
  • 2024-05-06
    Rule 264 OrderPublic

    Summary: The Mannheim Local Division issued a procedural order separating the infringement proceedings against Xiaomi defendants 1, 2, 7 and 8 (Chinese/HK entities to whom the statement of claim had not yet been served) from the proceedings against the other defendants (3–6, 9, 10) in Panasonic v Xiaomi (UPC_CFI_218/2023, EP 3 096 315). The separation under R. 303.2 RoP was ordered because the European defendants' representatives had not been mandated by the Chinese/HK defendants, and no service authorisation for the Chinese entities via the European affiliates existed.

    Show the legal issues (3)
    • Separation of proceedings under R. 303.2 RoP
    • Service of claim on defendants outside Contracting Member States
    • Service authorisation via group companies
Documents
  • E467E8FFB78D672D8924BD846A42C907_de.pdf2024-05-06DE