ORD_3184/2025

SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DISPLAY DEVICE AND SENSOR ELECTRONICS UNIT COMMUNICATION

Procedural & sub-applicationsCase Management OrdersCourt of AppealGeneric Order—Settled at: Post-merits

Parties

Claimants

Dexcom Inc.(Dexcom Group)

Reps: Marcus Grosch (Quinn Emanuel); Johannes Bukow (Quinn Emanuel); Jérôme Kommer (Quinn Emanuel); Katrin Gerstenberg (Quinn Emanuel); Sebastian Scholz (Quinn Emanuel); Laurin Haasis (Quinn Emanuel); Peter Klusmann (Hoffmann Eitle); David Sproston (Hoffmann Eitle); Mark Jones (Hoffmann Eitle)

Respondents

Abbott Laboratories(Abbott Group)
Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.(Abbott Group)
Abbott GmbH(Abbott Group)
Abbott Diagnostics GmbH(Abbott Group)
Abbott Logistics B.V.(Abbott Group)
Abbott (S.A./N.V.)(Abbott Group)
Abbott s.r.l.(Abbott Group)
Abbott B.V.(Abbott Group)
Abbott Scandinavia Aktiebolag(Abbott Group)
Abbott France (S.A.S.)(Abbott Group)

Reps: Dietrich Kamlah (Taylor Wessing); Christian Lederer (Taylor Wessing); Gisbert Hohagen (Taylor Wessing); Wim Maas (Taylor Wessing); Eelco Bergsma (Taylor Wessing); François Pochart (August Debouzy)

Judges

Rian KaldenPresiding judge
Ingeborg SimonssonLegally qualified judge and judge-rapporteur
Patricia RombachLegally qualified judge
Hergen KapelsTechnically qualified judge
Udo MatterTechnically qualified judge

Patents

EP3797685

CPC codes: A61B5/4839, A61B5/14865, A61B5/6898, A61B2560/0252, H04L67/12, G16H40/63, A61B5/0015, G16H40/60, A61B5/1116, A61B5/0004, A61B5/14532, A61B5/14546…

Sector: Healthcare Informatics

Outcome

Withdrawn

Filed: —

First decided: Jan 24, 2025

Language: —

Settled at: Post-merits — settled commercially

Court of Appeal order allowing withdrawal of the infringement appeal and counterclaim for revocation filed by DexCom against Abbott companies, pursuant to R. 265 RoP. The withdrawal was allowed, proceedings declared closed, and the impugned first-instance decision became ineffective. Court held that withdrawal may be filed in appeal proceedings, that withdrawal of a revocation counterclaim renders amendment requests ineffective, and that closure of proceedings renders the impugned decision ineffective.