View all cases
UPC APP 22399/2024
- Case details
- Status—ActionProcedural applicationCategoryOther procedural
- Parties
- Claimants
- 10x Genomics, Inc.Operating co.
- President and Fellows of Harvard CollegeUniversity / research
Representatives- Tilman Müller-Stoy-Bardehle Pagenberg
Respondents- NanoString Technologies Inc.Operating co.
- NanoString Technologies Germany GmbHOperating co.
- NanoString Technologies Netherlands B.V.Operating co.
Representatives- Oliver Jan Jüngst-Bird & Bird LLP
- Division
- Court of Appeal
- Judges
- —
- Language
- —
- First decided
- Aug 6, 2024
How this compares
How long the court takes to reach a first decision.
| Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|
| All UPC | 124 |
At the UPC: 10x Genomics, Inc. (40 cases)·NanoString Group (21 cases)
Start 14-day free trialAlready a user? Sign in
Related cases
Decisions
- 2024-08-06
Summary: The Court of Appeal dismissed 10x Genomics' application for review (Wiederaufnahme) of an earlier appeal order concerning provisional measures in which 10x Genomics had lost to NanoString. The court held that re-examination of evidence assessment is not available via a review application, and that the court's use of the phrase 'in the court's technical assessment' did not constitute use of judges' personal opinions as evidence. The court also held there was a legal basis for the cost allocation decision in Rule 242.1 RoP.
Show the legal issues (3)
- Review of prior appeal order under Rule 245 RoP
- Use of judges' technical expertise vs evidence
- Costs decision legal basis under Rule 242.1 RoP in provisional measures appeal
Documents
- 7C250A35761DC3F01B7B27B840285F3C_de.pdf2024-08-06DE