View all cases
- Case details
- StatusClaim dismissedActionProcedural applicationCategoryOther procedural
- Parties
- Respondents
- ASUSTek Computer Inc.Operating co.
- ASUS Computer GmbHOperating co.
- ASUSTEK (UK) LIMITEDOperating co.
Representatives- Alexander Wiese-Wildanger Kehrwald Graf von Schwerin & Partner mbB
- Division
- Munich LD
- Judges
- Technology
- Electrical engineeringTelecommunications · Digital communication
- Language
- —
- First decided
- Jul 3, 2025
How this compares
How long the court takes to reach a first decision.
| Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|
| All UPC | 124 |
| Munich LD | Locked |
| Judge Matthias Zigann | Locked |
At the UPC: Lenovo Group (15 cases)·Asus Group (46 cases)
Start 14-day free trialAlready a user? Sign in
Related cases
All proceedings on this patentThis dispute contains 3 other proceedings
Decisions
- 2025-07-03
Summary: Munich Local Division (3 July 2025) dismissed Lenovo's application for an extension of time, holding that the application lacked any legal interest because the UPC case management system's scheduled downtime was already automatically covered by R. 301.2 RoP's automatic extension provision.
Show the legal issues (3)
- Application for extension of time (R. 9.3 RoP)
- Automatic extension during CMS downtime (R. 301.2 RoP)
- Legal interest
Documents
- 5E09DC32B1622A347DA9399989F0A5FD_de.pdf2025-07-03DE