View all cases
- Case details
- StatusSettledActionProcedural applicationCategoryWithdrawal applications
- Parties
- Claimants
- Truma Gerätetechnik GmbH & Co. KGOperating co.
Representatives- Axel Verhauwen-Krieger Mes & Graf von der Groeben
- Jens Künzel-Krieger Mes & Graf von der Groeben
- Peter Wilhelmsupporting-Ruff, Wilhelm, Beier, Dauster & Partner mbB
Respondents- CAN Srl Airxcel EuropeOperating co.
- Division
- Dusseldorf LD
- Technology
- Mechanical engineeringThermal processes and apparatus
- Language
- —
- First decided
- Jul 24, 2025
How this compares
How long the court takes to reach a first decision.
| Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|
| All UPC | 124 |
| Dusseldorf LD | Locked |
| Judge Berenice Thom | Locked |
| Judge Jule Schumacher | Locked |
| Judge Mojca Mlakar | Locked |
At the UPC: Truma Gerätetechnik GmbH & Co. KG (4 cases)·CAN Srl Airxcel Europe (4 cases)
Start 14-day free trialAlready a user? Sign in
Related cases
All proceedings on this patentThis dispute contains 3 other proceedings
Start a free trial to see how each one ended.
More cases: Dusseldorf LD·2025
Decisions
- 2025-07-24Application RoP 265Public
Summary: The Düsseldorf Local Division permitted the withdrawal of both Truma's infringement action and CAN Srl Airxcel Europe's revocation counterclaim, following an out-of-court settlement. The proceedings were declared closed with no cost decision. Each party was reimbursed 60% of its court fees (EUR 6,600 each). The dispute value was set at EUR 500,000 each for the infringement action and revocation counterclaim.
Show the legal issues (2)
- Withdrawal of action and counterclaim following out-of-court settlement under Rule 265 RoP
- Court fee reimbursement under Rules 370.9 and 370.11 RoP
Documents
- 7F4B6B5BCD0B3C87D399514EF145AEDA_de.pdf2025-07-24DE