View all cases
- Case details
- Status—ActionProcedural applicationCategoryOther procedural
- Parties
- Claimants
- Truma Gerätetechnik GmbH & Co. KGOperating co.
Representatives- Axel Verhauwen-Krieger Mes & Graf von der Groeben
- Jens Künzel-Krieger Mes & Graf von der Groeben
- Peter Wilhelmsupporting-Ruff, Wilhelm, Beier, Dauster & Partner mbB
Respondents- CAN Srl Airxcel EuropeOperating co.
- Division
- Dusseldorf LD
- Judges
- Technology
- Mechanical engineeringThermal processes and apparatus
- Language
- —
- First decided
- Oct 11, 2024
How this compares
How long the court takes to reach a first decision.
| Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|
| All UPC | 124 |
| Dusseldorf LD | Locked |
| Judge Berenice Thom | Locked |
At the UPC: Truma Gerätetechnik GmbH & Co. KG (4 cases)·CAN Srl Airxcel Europe (4 cases)
Start 14-day free trialAlready a user? Sign in
Related cases
All proceedings on this patentThis dispute contains 3 other proceedings
Start a free trial to see how each one ended.
More cases: Dusseldorf LD·2024
Decisions
- 2024-10-11
Summary: The Düsseldorf Local Division dismissed CAN Srl/Airxcel Europe's request for an extension of the preliminary objection and statement of defence deadlines, finding no exceptional circumstances justifying an extension under Rule 9.3(a) RoP.
Show the legal issues (3)
- Extension of time limits (Rule 9.3(a) RoP)
- Service at trade fair
- Strict time limit regime
Documents
- 35B485C0B5D52174C7EE8CEB0E315B28_de.pdf2024-10-11DE