View all cases
- Case details
- Status—ActionProcedural applicationCategoryOther procedural
- Parties
- Respondents
- Corning IncorporatedOperating co.
Representatives- Marcus Grosch-Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP
- Division
- Munich CD
- Judges
- Technology
- ChemistryMaterials, metallurgy
- Mechanical engineeringOther special machines
- Language
- —
- First decided
- Sep 8, 2025
How this compares
How long the court takes to reach a first decision.
| Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|
| All UPC | 124 |
| Munich CD | Locked |
| Judge András Kupecz | Locked |
At the UPC: TCL Group (35 cases)·Corning Incorporated (19 cases)
Start 14-day free trialAlready a user? Sign in
Related cases
All proceedings on this patentThis dispute contains 4 other proceedings
UPC CFI 986/2026·UPC CoA 38/2026·UPC CFI 337/2025·UPC APP 25818/2025
9 other defendants litigating the same or a related patent
UPC CFI 1766/2026·UPC CFI 866/2025·UPC CFI 416/2025·UPC CoA 424/2025·UPC CFI 775/2026 and 4 more
Decisions
- 2025-09-08
Summary: The Central Division (Section Munich) judge-rapporteur refused the claimant's application for a two-week extension of the deadline to reply to the defence to revocation, finding that the claimant had not demonstrated sufficient diligence in commencing technical testing.
Show the legal issues (2)
- Extension of time limits (R. 9.3(a) RoP)
- Diligence of party in commencing technical analysis
Documents
- 01C3EA5BA793440F427CEAD2BDB1CFAA_en.pdf2025-09-08EN