View all cases
- Case details
- Status—ActionProcedural applicationCategoryOther procedural
- Parties
- Claimants
- Dolby International ABOperating co.
Representatives- Volkmar Henke-Bardehle Pagenberg
- Tilman Müller-Bardehle Pagenberg
- Ann-Christine Hug-Bardehle Pagenberg
- Tobias Kaufmannsupporting-Bardehle Pagenberg
- Julian Rennersupporting-Bardehle Pagenberg
Respondents- Beko Germany GmbHOperating co.
- Arçelik A.Ş.Operating co.
Representatives- Jasper Werhahn-Meissner Bolte Patentanwälte Rechtsanwälte Partnerschaft mbB
- Tilman Pfrang-Meissner Bolte Patentanwälte Rechtsanwälte Partnerschaft mbB
- Joachim Gerstein-Meissner Bolte Patentanwälte Rechtsanwälte Partnerschaft mbB
- Niels Christof Julius Schuh-Meissner Bolte Patentanwälte Rechtsanwälte Partnerschaft mbB
- Andreas Kabisch-Meissner Bolte Patentanwälte Rechtsanwälte Partnerschaft mbB
- Division
- Dusseldorf LD
- Judges
- Technology
- Electrical engineeringComputer technology
- Language
- —
- First decided
- Sep 15, 2025
How this compares
How long the court takes to reach a first decision.
| Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|
| All UPC | 124 |
| Dusseldorf LD | Locked |
| Judge Jule Schumacher | Locked |
At the UPC: Dolby Group (38 cases)·Beko Germany GmbH (7 cases)
Start 14-day free trialAlready a user? Sign in
Related cases
All proceedings on this patentThis dispute contains 5 other proceedings
UPC CoA 77/2026·UPC CoA 78/2026·UPC CFI 1923/2025·UPC CFI 477/2024·UPC CFI 135/2024
7 other defendants litigating the same or a related patent
UPC CoA 118/2026·UPC CoA 119/2026·UPC CoA 120/2026·UPC CFI 2043/2026·UPC CFI 982/2026 and 2 more
Start a free trial to see how each one ended.
More cases: Dusseldorf LD·2025
Decisions
- 2025-09-15
Summary: The Düsseldorf Local Division denied Dolby International AB's application for court-ordered simultaneous interpretation (German to English) for the oral hearing, holding that a foreign claimant who chose German as the language of proceedings cannot compel the court to provide interpretation at court expense; Dolby could arrange its own interpretation under R. 109.2 RoP.
Show the legal issues (3)
- Simultaneous interpretation at oral hearing under R. 109.1 RoP
- Language of proceedings chosen by foreign claimant
- Court costs for interpretation
Documents
- 0D5B75D4DA5A0C2260B550DB4F04EF29_de.pdf2025-09-15DE