UPC CoA 78/2026
May 18, 2026·EP3605534 SEP · AUDIO DECODING WITH SELECTIVE POST FILTER
- Case details
- StatusCase Closed (Withdrawn)ActionAppealCategoryMain appeal
- Parties
- Division
- Court of Appeal
- Technology
- Electrical engineeringComputer technology
- Language
- English
- First decided
- Jul 28, 2026
- Last decision
- Oct 9, 2026
| Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|
| All UPC | 124 |
| Judge Rian Kalden | Locked |
| Judge Ingeborg Simonsson | Locked |
| Judge Patricia Rombach | Locked |
| Judge Torsten Duhme | Locked |
| Judge Andrea Perronace | Locked |
At the UPC: Beko Germany GmbH (7 cases)·Dolby Group (38 cases)
This dispute contains 5 other proceedings
UPC CoA 77/2026·UPC CFI 1923/2025·UPC CFI 477/2024·UPC CFI 135/2024·UPC APP 36556/2025
7 other defendants litigating the same or a related patent
UPC CoA 118/2026·UPC CoA 119/2026·UPC CoA 120/2026·UPC CFI 2043/2026·UPC CFI 982/2026 and 2 more
Start a free trial to see how each one ended.
More cases: Court of Appeal·2026
- 2026-10-09AppealPublic
Summary: The Court of Appeal permitted, under R. 265 RoP and with both parties' consent, the withdrawal of the infringement action UPC_CFI_135/2024 and the counterclaim for revocation UPC_CFI_477/2024, and declared the proceedings closed. No costs decision was needed, and 50% of the court fees Beko paid for each of the two appeals are to be reimbursed.
Show the legal issues (3)
- Withdrawal of infringement action and revocation counterclaim on appeal (R. 265 RoP)
- No legitimate interest in a decision given parties' consent
- Reimbursement of 50% of court fees on withdrawal during written procedure (R. 370.9(b), R. 370.11 RoP)
- 2026-07-28AppealPublic
Summary: The Court of Appeal judge-rapporteur granted Dolby's request under R. 295(d) RoP, agreed to by Beko, to stay the appeal proceedings UPC-CoA-77/2026 and UPC-CoA-78/2026 with immediate effect after the parties reached a settlement agreement under which they will withdraw their claims once the obligations are met. The parties must inform the Court once those obligations are fulfilled and either may request resumption.
Show the legal issues (3)
- stay of appeal proceedings at the joint request of the parties under R. 295(d) RoP
- effect of a settlement agreement pending fulfilment of its obligations
- resumption of stayed proceedings on a reasoned request
| Document title | Date | Public |
|---|---|---|
| Case closed | 2026-10-09 | Not public |
| Publication of decision | 2026-10-09 | Not public |
| Decision | 2026-10-09 | Not public |
| Decision | 2026-10-09 | Public |
| Receipt | 2026-10-07 | Not public |
| Cover sheet | 2026-10-07 | Not public |
| Document | 2026-10-07 | Not public |
| Communication | 2026-10-01 | Not public |
| Receipt | 2026-09-30 | Not public |
| Cover sheet | 2026-09-30 | Not public |