View all cases
- Case details
- StatusWithdrawnActionProcedural applicationCategoryOther procedural
- Parties
- Claimants
- KraussMaffei Extrusion GmbHOperating co.
Representatives- Daniel Seitz-Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Respondents- TROESTER GmbH & Co. KGOperating co.
Representatives- Alexander Wiese-Wildanger Kehrwald Graf von Schwerin & Partner mbB
- Division
- Munich LD
- Technology
- Mechanical engineeringOther special machines
- Language
- —
- First decided
- Jul 11, 2024
- EPO Opposition
- isarpatent - Patent- und Rechtsanwälte Behnisch Barth Charles Hassa Peckmann und Partner mbB2020-01-15
- TROESTER GmbH & Co. KG2020-01-16
How this compares
How long the court takes to reach a first decision.
| Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|
| All UPC | 124 |
| Munich LD | Locked |
| Judge Matthias Zigann | Locked |
| Judge Mojca Mlakar | Locked |
| Judge Tobias Pichlmaier | Locked |
| Judge Beate Schenk | Locked |
At the UPC: KraussMaffei Extrusion GmbH (2 cases)·TROESTER GmbH & Co. KG (2 cases)
Start 14-day free trialAlready a user? Sign in
Related cases
All proceedings on this patentThis dispute contains 1 other proceedings
Decisions
- 2024-07-11
Summary: Munich Local Division accepted withdrawal of KraussMaffei Extrusion GmbH's infringement action against TROESTER GmbH & Co. KG (EP 3 221 117). The parties reached an out-of-court settlement notified on 9 July 2024. The hearing date of 3 September 2024 was vacated, withdrawal permitted, and proceedings declared closed. Claimant was entitled to a 20% refund of court fees under R. 370.9(b)(iii) RoP as the written procedure had not yet been completed at the time of withdrawal (the oral hearing had taken place but further submissions had been ordered).
Show the legal issues (3)
- Withdrawal of infringement action after settlement (R. 265 RoP)
- Partial refund of court fees (R. 370.9(b)(iii) RoP)
- Whether written procedure was closed at time of withdrawal
Documents
- BF9526530BBB309FAF2EB5B107370A28_de.pdf2024-07-11DE