View all cases
- Case details
- Status—ActionProcedural applicationCategoryOther procedural
- Parties
- Respondents
- Kinexon Sports & Media GmbHOperating co.
Representatives- Tilman Müller-Stoy-Bardehle Pagenberg
- Division
- Paris CD
- Technology
- Other fieldsConsumer products
- Language
- —
- First decided
- Aug 21, 2024
How this compares
How long the court takes to reach a first decision.
| Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|
| All UPC | 124 |
| Paris CD | Locked |
| Judge François Thomas | Locked |
| Judge Maximilian Haedicke | Locked |
| Judge Gérard Myon | Locked |
At the UPC: Ballinno B.V. (9 cases)·Kinexon Sports & Media GmbH (9 cases)
Start 14-day free trialAlready a user? Sign in
Related cases
All proceedings on this patentThis dispute contains 8 other proceedings
UPC CFI 484/2025·UPC APP 44034/2024·UPC CoA 328/2024·UPC CFI 230/2024·UPC CFI 151/2024 and 3 more
Decisions
- 2024-08-21
Summary: Application by defendant Ballinno to stay revocation proceedings pending outcome of appeal against denial of provisional measures was refused. The court held that an appeal against the denial of provisional measures does not generally justify a stay of revocation proceedings under Rule 295(m) RoP, and that proceedings must normally allow the final oral hearing at first instance within one year.
Show the legal issues (3)
- Stay of revocation proceedings under Rule 295(m) RoP
- Relationship between appeal of provisional measures refusal and revocation proceedings
- One-year rule for first instance oral hearing
Documents
- 794542942E320F02E8C1E283B2B4917E_en.pdf2024-08-21EN