UPClytics
View all cases

UPC APP 45185/2024

Aug 5, 2024·EP3375337 · SANITATION BATH TUB DEVICE

Case details
Status
Case Closed
Action
Generic
Category
Costs assessments
Parties
Claimants
Representatives
Respondents
Representatives
Division
Dusseldorf LD
Technology
  • Other fields
    Consumer products
Language
German
First decided
May 13, 2025
How this compares
How long the court takes to reach a first decision.
Median days to first decision
All UPC124
Dusseldorf LDLocked
Judge Ronny ThomasLocked
Judge Berenice ThomLocked
Judge András KupeczLocked
Judge Bernard LedeboerLocked

At the UPC: Franz Kaldewei GmbH & Co. KG (4 cases)·Bette GmbH & Co. KG (4 cases)

Decisions
  • 2025-05-13

    Summary: Düsseldorf Local Division determined costs in UPC_CFI_7/2023 (Franz Kaldewei GmbH & Co. KG v Bette GmbH & Co. KG, first-ever UPC decision on the merits). The court ordered Bette (the unsuccessful defendant) to reimburse Kaldewei EUR 84,950 in total costs, rejecting Bette's challenge to the reasonableness of the amount. The court noted the extra effort required for the first substantive UPC decision as a justification for higher costs.

    Show the legal issues (4)
    • Cost assessment under Rule 156 RoP
    • Proportionality and reasonableness of legal costs
    • Extra costs justified for first-ever UPC substantive decision
    • Ceiling on recoverable costs
Documents
Document titleDatePublic
Headnote-and-Keywords2025-05-13Not public
Outcome of the Order2025-05-13Not public
Entscheidung im Kostenfestsetzungsverfahren2025-05-13Public
Stellungnahme zu Kosten2024-08-20Not public
Gelegenheit zur Stellungnahme R. 156.1 S. 2 VerfO2024-08-06Not public
Receipt2024-08-06Not public
2024-08-05-Kaldewei-Antrag-auf-Kostenfestsetzung-UPC_signed2024-08-05Not public
Anlage AR-KFA 012024-08-05Not public
Anlage AR-KFA 022024-08-05Not public