UPClytics
View all cases

UPC APP 47531/2024

EP2903267 SEP · IMAGE ENCODING METHOD, IMAGE DECODING METHOD, IMAGE ENCODING DEVICE, IMAGE DECODING DEVICE, AND IMAGE ENCODING/DECODING DEVICE

Case details
Status
—
Action
Preliminary objection
Category
Preliminary objection
Parties
Claimants
Representatives
Respondents
Representatives
Division
Munich LD
Technology
  • Electrical engineering
    Audio-visual technology
Language
—
First decided
Mar 18, 2025
How this compares
How long the court takes to reach a first decision.
Median days to first decision
All UPC124
Munich LDLocked
Judge Ulrike VoßLocked

At the UPC: Sun Patent Trust (31 cases)·Roku, Inc. (16 cases)

This dispute contains 3 other proceedings

UPC CFI 59/2025·UPC CFI 713/2024·UPC CFI 254/2024

2 other defendants litigating the same or a related patent

UPC CFI 1528/2026·UPC CFI 538/2025

Start a free trial to see how each one ended.

More cases: Munich LD·2024

Decisions
  • 2025-03-18
    Preliminary objectionPublic

    Summary: Procedural order from the Munich Local Division (UPC_CFI_254/2024) dismissing Roku's preliminary objection under R. 19.1(a) RoP against Sun Patent Trust's infringement action concerning EP 2 903 267. The Court ruled that: (1) alleged incompatibility of the UPCA with EU primary law is not a valid ground for preliminary objection; (2) a preliminary objection cannot be based on a violation of Art. 47(2) EU Charter or Art. 6 ECHR; (3) proof of the representative's authority for the opt-out withdrawal need not be included with the statement of claim unless challenged; and (4) for jurisdiction, only a plausible allegation of infringement is required.

    Show the legal issues (5)
    • Preliminary objection (R. 19.1 RoP)
    • Validity of UPCA under EU law
    • Opt-out withdrawal authority
    • Jurisdictional requirements
    • Art. 47 EU Charter and Art. 6 ECHR
Documents
  • A0ED0AC154ADA759729EEF41AFB0B565_de.pdf2025-03-18DE