View all cases
- Case details
- Status—ActionProcedural applicationCategoryOther procedural
- Parties
- Claimants
- MAARS HOLDING B.V.Operating co.
- MAARS PARTITIONING SYSTEMS B.V.Operating co.
- MAARS PROJECTEN B.V.Operating co.
- MAARS FRANCEOperating co.
Representatives- Martin Luten
- Michiel Rijsdijk
Respondents- CITY GLASS AND GLAZING PRIVATE LIMITEDOther / unknown
Representatives- Joel Coles-Powell Gilbert (Europe) LLP
- Division
- The Hague LD
- Technology
- Other fieldsCivil engineering
- Language
- —
- First decided
- Nov 19, 2024
How this compares
How long the court takes to reach a first decision.
| Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|
| All UPC | 124 |
| The Hague LD | Locked |
| Judge Edger Brinkman | Locked |
| Judge Stefan Johansson | Locked |
| Judge Margot Kokke | Locked |
At the UPC: MAARS HOLDING B.V. (3 cases)·CITY GLASS AND GLAZING PRIVATE LIMITED (3 cases)
Start 14-day free trialAlready a user? Sign in
Related cases
All proceedings on this patentThis dispute contains 2 other proceedings
Start a free trial to see how each one ended.
More cases: The Hague LD·2024
Decisions
- 2024-11-19
Summary: The Hague Local Division panel considered MAARS companies' application for security for costs against City Glass and Glazing Private Limited (claimant/patentee, domiciled in India) in an infringement action, ruling on the appropriate level of security and whether leave for interim appeal should be granted. The application was for security of at least EUR 49,000.
Show the legal issues (2)
- Security for costs against foreign claimant under Rule 158 RoP
- Leave for interim appeal on security for costs orders
Documents
- 7D10E904EA9511D352492B430B25D547_en.pdf2024-11-19EN