- Case details
- Status—ActionEx parte reviewCategoryOther procedural
- Parties
- Claimants
- Hybridgenerator ApSOperating co.
Representatives- Mikkel Kleis-Patrade
- Lasse Rosenlund Lauridsen
Respondents- HGSystem ApSOperating co.
- Rune EilertsenIndividual
- Infotech Holding ApSOther / unknown
- Infotech Concept ApSOperating co.
- HGSystem Holding ApSOperating co.
Representatives- Allan Christensen
- Jacob Karstad Meyland
- Division
- Copenhagen LD
- Judges
- Technology
- Electrical engineeringElectrical machinery, apparatus, energy
- Language
- —
- First decided
- Dec 19, 2024
- EPO Opposition
- HGSystem ApSAdmissible2025-05-13
| Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|
| All UPC | 124 |
| Copenhagen LD | Locked |
| Judge Peter Agergaard | Locked |
At the UPC: Hybridgenerator ApS (12 cases)·HGSystem ApS (12 cases)
This dispute contains 11 other proceedings
UPC CoA 169/2026·UPC CoA 170/2026·UPC CoA 171/2026·UPC CoA 172/2026·UPC CoA 124/2026 and 6 more
Start a free trial to see how each one ended.
More cases: Copenhagen LD·2024
- 2024-12-19Request to review an order ex-partePublic
Summary: Order of the Copenhagen Local Division upholding (under Art. 60(6) UPCA and Rule 197 RoP) the ex-parte evidence preservation and inspection order of 26 August 2024 issued in favour of Hybridgenerator ApS against HGSystem ApS and associated entities concerning EP 4 238 202 B1. After review at the request of the respondents, the Court confirmed that there remained sufficient evidence of infringement of the patent by the challenged products, rejecting arguments that the products had been modified after the preservation proceedings commenced. The expert IT report is released to the parties' representatives.
Show the legal issues (3)
- Review of ex-parte evidence preservation order Rule 197.3 RoP
- Standard of proof for evidence preservation Art. 60 UPCA
- Alleged modification of infringing products post-preservation
- 54BA55D33CE63E0334972335BE94C1D9_da.pdf2024-12-19DA