UPC Analytics
ENDE
Overview · Filed:

UPC_APP_58871/2024

OtherPreliminary ObjectionHamburg LDPreliminary objection
Parties

Claimants

  • Visibly Inc.
Reps: Marc Grunwald

Respondents

  • Easee B.V.
  • Yves Prevoo
  • Easee Holding B.V.
Reps: Wim Maas
Judges
  • [judge-Rapporteur]Judge-Rapporteur
Patents
  • [Not specified in excerpt]
Outcome
Dismissed
Filed:
First decided: Dec 18, 2024
Language:

Procedural order of the Hamburg Local Division rejecting a preliminary objection (Rule 19 RoP) filed by defendants Easee B.V., Yves Prevoo (director), and Easee Holding B.V. against Visibly Inc.'s patent infringement action. The court rejected the jurisdictional challenge, holding: (1) an alleged patent infringement constitutes a tort under Art. 7(2) Brussels I recast Regulation, giving the UPC jurisdiction over director liability claims as well; (2) the question whether a director can be held personally liable is a matter of the merits, not of jurisdiction. The court confirmed the Hamburg Local Division's competence under Art. 33(1)(a) UPCA based on the place where the alleged infringement may occur (Germany). Leave to appeal was granted.