View all cases
UPC APP 60996/2024
EP4026488 Unitary patent · TRANSCUTANEOUS ANALYTE SENSOR SYSTEMS AND METHODS
- Case details
- Status—ActionProcedural applicationCategoryOther procedural
- Parties
- Claimants
- Dexcom Inc.Operating co.
Representatives- Markus Grosch-Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP
- Johannes Bukow-Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP
- Jan Axtmann-Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP
- Paul Lehmann-Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP
Respondents- Abbott LaboratoriesOperating co.
- Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Operating co.
- Abbott GmbHOperating co.
- Abbott Diagnostics GmbHOperating co.
- Abbott Laboratories GmbHOperating co.
- Abbott Logistics B.V.Operating co.
- Abbott FranceOperating co.
- Abbott s.r.l.Operating co.
- Abbott Gesellschaft m.b.H.Operating co.
- Abbott B.V.Operating co.
- Abbott (S.A./N.V.)Operating co.
- Abbott Scandinavia AktiebolagOperating co.
- Abbott OyOperating co.
Representatives- Dietrich Kamlah-Taylor Wessing
- Christian Lederer-Taylor Wessing
- Gisbert Hohagen-Taylor Wessing
- Division
- Dusseldorf LD
- Judges
- —
- Technology
- InstrumentsMedical technology
- Language
- —
- First decided
- Nov 20, 2024
- EPO Opposition
- Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Withdrawn2024-04-18
- Abbott GmbHWithdrawn2024-04-19
How this compares
How long the court takes to reach a first decision.
| Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|
| All UPC | 124 |
| Dusseldorf LD | Locked |
At the UPC: Dexcom Group (39 cases)·Abbott Group (67 cases)
Start 14-day free trialAlready a user? Sign in
Related cases
All proceedings on this patentThis dispute contains 3 other proceedings
Start a free trial to see how each one ended.
More cases: Dusseldorf LD·2024
Decisions
- 2024-11-20
Summary: Düsseldorf Local Division procedural order extending the time limit for DexCom Inc. to file its Rejoinder to the Counterclaim for Revocation and Reply to Application to Amend until 11 December 2024, in DexCom v. Abbott entities (EP 4 026 488). The extension was granted on grounds of fairness/equity because the previous time period for defendants had been similarly extended with claimant's consent.
Show the legal issues (2)
- Extension of time limits (R. 9.3(a) RoP)
- Fairness in setting equal procedural deadlines
Documents
- BB566235706F9F1CDDC239781D21203D_en.pdf2024-11-20EN