View all cases
- Case details
- Status—ActionProcedural applicationCategoryOther procedural
- Parties
- Respondents
- Xiaomi Communications Co., Ltd.Operating co.
- Xiaomi Inc.Operating co.
- Xiaomi Technology Netherlands B.V.Operating co.
- Xiaomi Technology Germany GmbHOperating co.
Representatives- Eva Acker-Freshfields
- Division
- Hamburg LD
- Judges
- Technology
- Electrical engineeringElectrical machinery, apparatus, energy · Digital communication
- Language
- —
- First decided
- Dec 30, 2024
How this compares
How long the court takes to reach a first decision.
| Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|
| All UPC | 124 |
| Hamburg LD | Locked |
| Judge Stefan Schilling | Locked |
At the UPC: Nera Innovations Ltd. (7 cases)·Xiaomi Group (92 cases)
Start 14-day free trialAlready a user? Sign in
Related cases
All proceedings on this patentThis dispute contains 6 other proceedings
UPC CFI 730/2025·UPC CoA 692/2025·UPC CFI 424/2024·UPC CoA 205/2024·UPC CFI 173/2024 and 1 more
Start a free trial to see how each one ended.
More cases: Hamburg LD·2024
Decisions
- 2024-12-30
Summary: The Hamburg Local Division issued a procedural order in Nera Innovations v Xiaomi infringement proceedings concerning EP2642632, ruling that it is not ordinarily appropriate for the judge-rapporteur to make a preliminary ruling by the full panel under R.334(h) RoP on the admissibility of patent amendment-based case amendments, as such decisions should be reserved for oral hearings.
Show the legal issues (5)
- Case amendment (R.263 RoP)
- Preliminary ruling by full panel (R.334(h) RoP)
- Admissibility of patent amendment-based amendments
- Procedural economy
- Scope of judge-rapporteur authority
Documents
- 431B635F3A18CC6FD3520D6E4E4BD0AB_de.pdf2024-12-30DE