View all cases
- Case details
- Status—ActionProcedural applicationCategoryOther procedural
- Parties
- Claimants
- DISH Technologies L.L.C.Operating co.
- Sling TV L.L.C.Operating co.
Representatives- Denise Benz-A&O Shearman
Respondents- AYLO PREMIUM LTDOperating co.
- AYLO Billing LimitedOperating co.
- AYLO FREESITES LTDOperating co.
- AYLO BILLING US CORP.Operating co.
- BROCKWELL GROUP LLCOperating co.
- BRIDGEMAZE GROUP LLCOther / unknown
Representatives- Tilman Müller-Stoy-Bardehle Pagenberg
- Conor McLaughlin-Mishcon de Reya LLP
- Division
- Mannheim LD
- Judges
- Technology
- Electrical engineeringAudio-visual technology · Digital communication · Computer technology
- Language
- —
- First decided
- Aug 6, 2025
How this compares
How long the court takes to reach a first decision.
| Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|
| All UPC | 124 |
| Mannheim LD | Locked |
| Judge Dirk Böttcher | Locked |
At the UPC: DISH Technologies L.L.C. (20 cases)·Aylo Group (18 cases)
Start 14-day free trialAlready a user? Sign in
Related cases
All proceedings on this patentThis dispute contains 19 other proceedings
UPC CoA 708/2025·UPC CoA 709/2025·UPC CoA 710/2025·UPC CoA 711/2025·UPC CoA 719/2025 and 14 more
Start a free trial to see how each one ended.
More cases: Mannheim LD·2024
Decisions
- 2025-08-06
Summary: The Mannheim Local Division ruled that a separate costs assessment procedure under R.150 RoP is not available for costs incurred in applications for procedural orders such as security for costs (R.158 RoP), and that such costs will instead be assessed as part of the overall costs assessment following the final decision on the merits.
Show the legal issues (3)
- Costs assessment for interlocutory security for costs proceedings (R.150, R.158 RoP)
- Scope of interim costs assessment
- Costs of appeal against security for costs order
Documents
- 3F0D6A3CB50DB04F8525ED9EF1F61982_de.pdf2025-08-06DE