View all cases
UPC APP 66712/2024
- Case details
- Status—ActionProcedural applicationCategoryWithdrawal applications
- Parties
- Claimants
- Tesla Germany GmbHOperating co.
- Tesla Manufacturing Brandenburg SEOperating co.
Representatives- Marcus Grosch-Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP
Respondents- Avago Technologies International Sales Pte. LimitedOperating co.
Representatives- Florian Schmidt-Bogatzky
- Division
- Hamburg LD
- Judges
- Language
- —
- First decided
- Jan 16, 2025
How this compares
How long the court takes to reach a first decision.
| Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|
| All UPC | 124 |
| Hamburg LD | Locked |
| Judge Stefan Schilling | Locked |
At the UPC: Tesla Group (25 cases)·Broadcom Group (52 cases)
Start 14-day free trialAlready a user? Sign in
Related cases
Decisions
- 2025-01-16Application RoP 265Public
Summary: Hamburg Local Division judge-rapporteur allowed Tesla Germany GmbH and Tesla Manufacturing Brandenburg SE to withdraw their cost assessment application (Rule 156 RoP) in proceedings UPC_CFI_54/2023, where the main action and counterclaim had been withdrawn at appeal level following an out-of-court settlement. The court held that while the Court of Appeal has jurisdiction over the withdrawal of the main proceedings (pending on appeal), the first-instance cost assessment procedure remained before the first-instance judge-rapporteur under Rule 156.2 RoP, who alone could allow its withdrawal under Rule 265 RoP.
Show the legal issues (3)
- Jurisdiction over withdrawal of cost assessment when main proceedings on appeal
- Withdrawal of cost assessment application under Rule 265 RoP
- Competence of judge-rapporteur under Rule 156.2 RoP
Documents
- EB09CC1561D9527F1B051A106C07CA3C_de.pdf2025-01-16DE