UPC APP 66712/2024
- Verfahrensdetails
- Status—VerfahrensartVerfahrensantragKategorieRücknahmeanträge
- Parteien
- Kläger
- Tesla Germany GmbHUnternehmen
- Tesla Manufacturing Brandenburg SEUnternehmen
Vertreter- Marcus Grosch-Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP
BeklagteVertreter- Florian Schmidt-Bogatzky
- Division
- Hamburg LD
- Richter
- Sprache
- —
- Erste Entscheidung
- 16. Jan. 2025
| Median Tage bis zur ersten Entscheidung | |
|---|---|
| Gesamt-UPC | 124 |
| Hamburg LD | Gesperrt |
| Richter Stefan Schilling | Gesperrt |
Vor dem UPC: Tesla Group (25 Verfahren)·Broadcom Group (52 Verfahren)
Starten Sie die kostenlose Testphase, um die Ausgänge zu sehen.
Weitere Verfahren: Hamburg LD·2024
- 2025-01-16Application RoP 265Öffentlich
Zusammenfassung: Hamburg Local Division judge-rapporteur allowed Tesla Germany GmbH and Tesla Manufacturing Brandenburg SE to withdraw their cost assessment application (Rule 156 RoP) in proceedings UPC_CFI_54/2023, where the main action and counterclaim had been withdrawn at appeal level following an out-of-court settlement. The court held that while the Court of Appeal has jurisdiction over the withdrawal of the main proceedings (pending on appeal), the first-instance cost assessment procedure remained before the first-instance judge-rapporteur under Rule 156.2 RoP, who alone could allow its withdrawal under Rule 265 RoP.
Rechtsfragen anzeigen (3)
- Jurisdiction over withdrawal of cost assessment when main proceedings on appeal
- Withdrawal of cost assessment application under Rule 265 RoP
- Competence of judge-rapporteur under Rule 156.2 RoP
- EB09CC1561D9527F1B051A106C07CA3C_de.pdf2025-01-16DE