UPClytics
Alle Fälle anzeigen

UPC APP 66712/2024

Verfahrensdetails
Status
Verfahrensart
Verfahrensantrag
Kategorie
Rücknahmeanträge
Parteien
Beklagte
Vertreter: Florian Schmidt-Bogatzky
Division
Hamburg LD
Richter
Sprache
Erste Entscheidung
16. Jan. 2025
Entscheidungen
  • 2025-01-16
    Application Rop 265

    Hamburg Local Division judge-rapporteur allowed Tesla Germany GmbH and Tesla Manufacturing Brandenburg SE to withdraw their cost assessment application (Rule 156 RoP) in proceedings UPC_CFI_54/2023, where the main action and counterclaim had been withdrawn at appeal level following an out-of-court settlement. The court held that while the Court of Appeal has jurisdiction over the withdrawal of the main proceedings (pending on appeal), the first-instance cost assessment procedure remained before the first-instance judge-rapporteur under Rule 156.2 RoP, who alone could allow its withdrawal under Rule 265 RoP.

    Rechtsfragen:Jurisdiction over withdrawal of cost assessment when main proceedings on appealWithdrawal of cost assessment application under Rule 265 RoPCompetence of judge-rapporteur under Rule 156.2 RoP
Dokumente
  • EB09CC1561D9527F1B051A106C07CA3C_de.pdf2025-01-16DE