View all cases
UPC APP 6926/2024
EP3594009 · LITHOGRAPHIC PRINTING PLATE ORIGINAL PLATE, AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING LITHOGRAPHIC PRINTING PLATE
- Case details
- Status—Action—CategoryOther procedural
- Parties
- Respondents
- Kodak GmbHOperating co.
- Kodak Graphic Communications GmbHOperating co.
- Kodak Holding GmbHOperating co.
Representatives- Eva Acker-Freshfields
- Division
- —
- Judges
- —
- Technology
- InstrumentsOptics
- Mechanical engineeringTextile and paper machines
- Language
- —
How this compares
How long the court takes to reach a first decision.
| Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|
| All UPC | 124 |
At the UPC: Fujifilm Group (52 cases)·Kodak Group (52 cases)
Start 14-day free trialAlready a user? Sign in
Related cases
All proceedings on this patentThis dispute contains 7 other proceedings
UPC CFI 186/2025·CC 3088/2024·UPC CFI 355/2023·UPC APP 17472/2024·UPC APP 54506/2024 and 2 more
Start a free trial to see how each one ended.
More cases: 2024
Decisions
- 2024-02-21Infringement ActionPublic
Summary: The Düsseldorf Local Division issued a procedural order in FUJIFILM v. Kodak GmbH, granting the defendants a retrospective extension of the deadline to file their counterclaim for revocation in the dedicated CMS workflow, on the conditions that a first filing attempt had been made before the deadline and the corrected upload was made without culpable delay.
Show the legal issues (3)
- Rule 9.3(a) RoP: retrospective extension of deadline for counterclaim for revocation CMS workflow
- Requirement that counterclaim be filed in dedicated CMS workflow under Rule 25.1 RoP
- Conditions for retrospective extension: timely first attempt and no culpable delay
Documents
- 2024-02-21%20LD%20D%C3%BCsseldorf%20UPC_CFI_355-2023%20ACT_578607-2023%20App_6926-2024%20anonymized%20%281%29.pdf2024-02-21EN