UPC APP 6926/2024

—·EP3594009: LITHOGRAPHIC PRINTING PLATE ORIGINAL PLATE, AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING LITHOGRAPHIC PRINTING PLATE

Case details: Status
—
Action
Infringement
Category
Main Infringement Action
Parties: Claimants
Fujifilm Corporation
Reps: Lars Baum (Hoyng Rokh Monegier)
Respondents
Kodak GmbH
Kodak Graphic Communications GmbH
Kodak Holding GmbH
Reps: Eva Acker (Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer)
Division: Dusseldorf LD
Judges: —
Technology: Industrial Manufacturing · Printing Plates
Language: —
First decided: Feb 21, 2024

Decisions

2024-02-21
Infringement Action
The Düsseldorf Local Division issued a procedural order in FUJIFILM v. Kodak GmbH, granting the defendants a retrospective extension of the deadline to file their counterclaim for revocation in the dedicated CMS workflow, on the conditions that a first filing attempt had been made before the deadline and the corrected upload was made without culpable delay.
Legal issues:Rule 9.3(a) RoP: retrospective extension of deadline for counterclaim for revocation CMS workflowRequirement that counterclaim be filed in dedicated CMS workflow under Rule 25.1 RoPConditions for retrospective extension: timely first attempt and no culpable delay
2024-02-21
Infringement Action
Duplicate version of the 21 February 2024 Düsseldorf Local Division procedural order in FUJIFILM v. Kodak, granting a retrospective extension of the CMS workflow deadline for filing the counterclaim for revocation.
Legal issues:Rule 9.3(a) RoP: retrospective extension of deadline for counterclaim for revocation CMS workflowConditions for retrospective extension

Documents

2024-02-21%20LD%20D%C3%BCsseldorf%20UPC_CFI_355-2023%20ACT_578607-2023%20App_6926-2024%20anonymized%20%281%29.pdf2024-02-21EN
2024-02-21%20LD%20D%C3%BCsseldorf%20UPC_CFI_355-2023%20ACT_578607-2023%20App_6926-2024%20anonymized%20%283%29.pdf2024-02-21EN