View all cases
- Case details
- Status—ActionPreliminary objectionCategoryPreliminary objection
- Parties
- Claimants
- F. Hoffmann-La Roche AGOperating co.
- Roche Diabetes Care GmbHOperating co.
Representatives- Christof Augenstein-Kather Augenstein
- Sophie Prudent-Kather Augenstein
- Katharina Brandt-Kather Augenstein
Respondents- Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc.Operating co.
- Tandem Diabetes Care Europe B.V.Operating co.
- VitalAire GmbHOperating co.
- Dinno Santé s.a.i.Operating co.
- Air Liquide Healthcare Nederland B.V.Operating co.
- Rubin Medical ApSOperating co.
Representatives- Charlotte Garnitsch-Taylor Wessing
- Wim Maas-Taylor Wessing
- Christine Kanz-Hoyng Rokh Monegier
- Division
- Dusseldorf LD
- Judges
- Technology
- InstrumentsMeasurement · Medical technology
- Language
- —
- First decided
- Apr 11, 2024
How this compares
How long the court takes to reach a first decision.
| Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|
| All UPC | 124 |
| Dusseldorf LD | Locked |
| Judge Berenice Thom | Locked |
At the UPC: Roche Group (29 cases)·Tandem Diabetes Care Group (18 cases)
Start 14-day free trialAlready a user? Sign in
Related cases
All proceedings on this patentThis dispute contains 8 other proceedings
CC 20972/2024·CC 21542/2024·UPC CFI 504/2023·UPC APP 11294/2025·UPC APP 23079/2025 and 3 more
Start a free trial to see how each one ended.
More cases: Dusseldorf LD·2024
Decisions
- 2024-04-11Preliminary objectionPublic
Summary: Procedural order from the Düsseldorf Local Division (UPC_CFI_504/2023) on a preliminary objection under R. 21.2 RoP concerning the language of proceedings. The order addressed service of the Statement of Claim on multiple defendants in the Roche Diabetes Care v. Tandem Diabetes Care and others case concerning EP 1 970 677.
Show the legal issues (2)
- Language of proceedings (R. 21.2 RoP)
- Preliminary objection
Documents
- 97D9B20C69C7A414AA0DAD0EE41ECD6D_de.pdf2024-04-11DE